pelicanweblogo2010

Mother Pelican
A Journal of Solidarity and Sustainability

Vol. 22, No. 4, April 2026
Luis T. Gutiérrez, Editor
Home Page
Front Page

motherpelicanlogo2012


The Fire We Feed: Rethinking
Food, Population, and Prosperity
on a Finite Planet

Steve Salmony

April 2026



World population supported by synthetic nitrogen fertilizers.
Source: Our World in Data via Wikimedia Commons.
Click on the image to enlarge.


Homo sapiens faces a self-perpetuating crisis born of inverted logic: the delusional belief that endlessly increasing food production solves hunger has instead fueled explosive population growth, creating a vicious cycle where more food enables more people, who then demand more food. This tragic cognitive error stems from treating the finite biosphere as an infinite marketplace. Our economic models view food as a commodity to be scaled with demand, when ecological science reveals food as the primary lever of human carrying capacity, just as is the case with every other species. For generations, we have operated under a single, compelling directive: to feed a growing population, we must produce more food. This seems self-evident, a moral imperative. Yet this foundational belief is catastrophically backwards. Our relentless drive to increase the food supply is not dousing the flames of hunger but is the very act of feeding the fire that creates more hunger, overwhelming our frangible planet’s capacity to sustain life.

This unsettling reality finds its roots in the science of thermodynamics and ecology that governs all life of Earth. Homo sapiens, for all our cultural and technological achievements, are not exempt from certain "rules of the house" of our planetary home. The science of population dynamics demonstrates a fundamental principle: human population numbers appear as a function of food supply. For the past two centuries, humanity has been engaged in a grand, planet-wide effort to increase this single variable. Through sanitation, medicine, and fossil-fuel-powered agriculture, we systematically dismantled the natural checks that had historically regulated our population. By flooding the system with abundant food, we created a self-reinforcing feedback loop of extraordinary power: more food allows more people to live; more people are then cited as the reason to produce even more food. We are not solving hunger; we are stoking the fire, ensuring the absolute number of the vulnerable grows with the swelling base population.

This fatally flawed logic is enshrined in the policies of powerful global institutions. Their mantra that food production must be increased continuously to meet the needs of a growing population is a consensually validated mistake of monumental proportions. It inverts cause and effect. Food availability is the independent variable, the driver; population size is the dependent variable, the consequence. To believe otherwise is to subscribe to a preternatural view of humanity, one that places us outside the ecosystem we inhabit. It is a collective delusion that ignores the physical reality of a finite planet, treating the biosphere as an eternally expressive teat rather than a complex, fragile system with defined limitations.

The repercussions of this delusionally inverted logic form the pillars of our polycrisis. The population explosion --- from one to eight billion in a geological instant --- is the multiplier of every ecological breakdown. Feeding this fire demands the conversion of wild landscapes into monoculture agriculture, mining ancient aquifers, saturating the soil with fertilizers and pesticides, and filling the atmosphere with carbon emissions. These actions, in turn, fuel climate destabilization, biodiversity collapse, and widespread environmental degradation. The marketplace sees this as increased productivity and gross domestic product; the biosphere registers it as systemic liquidation, a drawdown of finite natural capital for transient surplus. The claim of human exceptionalism rings hollow in the face of these biophysical realities. We are an exceptional species in our unique capabilities, but not in our population dynamics.

The path forward demands a fundamental reorientation of contemporary civilization’s goal: from maximizing market exchange within a Cornucopian fantasy to optimizing human well-being within a finite and fragile planetary home. This means consciously and humanely beginning to reduce the global fuel supply --- the scale of industrial food production --- to a level the planet can sustain indefinitely, while ensuring equitable distribution of what is produced to all in need. This is not austerity; it is the responsible management of abundance to prevent a future of irreversible, catastrophic scarcity. Concomitantly, we must empower every person with the means and rights to control their own reproduction. Universal access to voluntary contraception and the elevation of women’s educational and economic opportunities are not separate issues; they are essential partners in damping the fire’s core drivers. These measures advance human rights and dignity, yet by themselves they will be insufficient if the powerful presence of an increasing food supply continues to drive population growth.

Transforming our economic system from a market-based engine of plunder and extraction into a biosphere-based framework for stewardship is the task at hand. The gross domestic product, the primary metric by which we judge societal health, is little more than a measure of transactions, regardless of whether those transactions represent health or harm. This economic system operates like a perpetual motion machine and addresses the living world as both a limitless quarry and an unbound landfill. It treats human beings as cogs in the machine. The debt-based nature of money compounds the problem, as interest demands future growth for repayment, locking us into a trajectory of expansion even when expansion is precisely what will lead to collapse.

Achieving a sustainable economy requires a suite of coordinated interventions, beginning with a transformation of our accounting systems. Full-cost accounting must internalize environmental and social impacts, so that prices embrace ecological reality. By taxing pollution, resource depletion, and carbon emissions, we would internalize the externalities that have been treated as free, redirecting enterprise toward regeneration rather than degradation. Alongside accurate pricing, we must reform the very nature of money and finance. Central bankers possess the tools to engage in green quantitative easing, purchasing assets that fund renewable energy and ecological restoration rather than propping up fossil fuel incumbents. The financial system must become more distributed, strengthening local investment platforms and community banking to ensure resources reach the extremities of the real economy, fostering resilient and diverse solutions.

Culturally, we must replace the hubris of human exceptionalism with ecological literacy, grounding ourselves in the science of thermodynamics and population ecology. Education must pivot from ideologically driven neoclassical economic theories to understandings grounded in the hard realities of a relatively small, delimited biosphere. Systems thinking must reveal the positive feedback loops driving our crises, demonstrating that simply increasing food supply without understanding population dynamics will drive further resource depletion and habitat destruction. Every policy must be weighed against its long-term impact on planetary habitability rather than its short-term contribution to economic growth. We need stewards, not masters; citizens who see themselves as creatures of Earth, not as rulers of the universe or detached comptrollers of a lifeless ledger.

The forces of denial are powerful, invested in a status quo that promises technological salvation or fortified escape for a privileged few. But no bunker is deep enough, no island remote enough, no spacecraft high enough to evade the consequences of a collapsing biosphere. The choice is between two futures. In one, we cling to the delusion of perpetual growth, allowing the colossal economic machine to run until it seizes and collapses, leaving our descendants to pick through the wreckage on a degraded planet. In the other, we summon the clarity of vision, coherence of mind, and moral courage to orchestrate a controlled descent through regenerative farming, economic transitions, and biosphere-based democratic governance. Our generation bears a unique burden: we are the first to see the crisis of the entire Earth system clearly, and we may be the last with the agency to alter its trajectory. The equation is stark. We have fed the fire to the brink of planetary burnout. The time to speak out, to act, and to choose a different path is now, before the window of opportunity closes and the door to alternative futures on Earth slams shut.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Steven Earl Salmony, Ph.D., M.P.A. is a retired practicing psychologist. In 2001 Steve founded the AWAREness Campaign on the Human Population to raise consciousness of the colossal threat that the unbridled, near exponential growth of absolute global human population numbers poses for life as it is known to us. His campaign has focused upon the best available science of human population dynamics and the topic of human overpopulation of earth in our time. He can be reached at sesalmony@aol.com.


|Back to Title|

LINK TO THE CURRENT ISSUE          LINK TO THE HOME PAGE

"There are two ways of exerting one's strength:
one is pushing down, the other is pulling up."


— Booker T. Washington (1856-1915)

GROUP COMMANDS AND WEBSITES

Write to the Editor
Send email to Subscribe
Send email to Unsubscribe
Link to the Group Website
Link to the Home Page

CREATIVE
COMMONS
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
ISSN 2165-9672

Page 17