ARTICLES
Population Growth is Not Good for People or the Planet
Nandita Bajaj
A Note on the Social Ecology of Capital
Éric Pineault
A Stranded Society: Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in a Post-Carbon World
Ben Shread-Hewitt
Why are Feminist Perspectives, Analyses, and Actions Vital to Degrowth?
Corinna Denglera et al
Degrowth and Masculinities: Towards a Gendered Understanding of Degrowth Subjectivities
Dennis Eversberga & Matthias Schmelzera
Denial Doesn't Change Our Climate Reality: Earth Is Becoming a Sacrifice Zone
J. P. Sottile
Little Things Mean a Lot: The World's Microbiome Under Threat
Kurt Cobb
Public Service Through Concordian Economics
Carmine Gorga
On Beauty and Becoming Just, Part III ~ Tiny Home Discrimination: Ecological Living Is Illegal
by Cara Judea Alhadeff
What Can We Learn From Indigenous Ecological Knowledge?
Ngozi Unuigbe
Two Billion More Coming
Dave Pollard
Dangers From Future Technologies? It's the Current Ones that Are Killing Us
Kurt Cobb
The Bumpy Road Ahead for the World Economy
Gail Tverberg
Global Polycrisis as a Pathway for Economic Transition
Zack Walsh
From Growth, Through Degrowth, to a Pluriverse of Flourishings
Saurabh Arora & Andy Stirling
Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change
Paul Mobbs
I Warned Against the Green Energy 'Boom' ~ It Sparked Debate
Andrew Nikiforuk
The Role of Population Growth During Three Decades of Increasing Carbon Emissions
Lucia Tamburino & Philip Cafaro
At Least 80% of the World's Most Important Land Sites for Biodiversity Currently Contain Human Developments
Ashley Simkins & Stuart Butchart
How Bioenergy Causes Air Pollution: The Dark Side of Renewable Energy
Sam Davis
Sustainability Is Not Enough: We Need Regenerative Cultures
Daniel Christian Wahl
'Regenerative Agriculture' Is All the Rage ~ But It's Not Going to Fix Our Food System
Anja Bless
The Never, Never, Neverland of Degrowth
George Tsakraklides
The Catholic Church's Gender Ideology Is Complementarian and Binary ~ That's Not How Nature Works
Rebecca Bratten Weiss
Population Growth is Not Good for People or the Planet
Nandita Bajaj
This article was originally published by
Inter Press Service (IPS), 10 May 2023
REPUBLISHED WITH PERMISSION
Click on the image to enlarge.
According to the United Nations, the world’s population is more than three times larger than it was in the mid-twentieth century. The global human population reached 8.0 billion in mid-November 2022 from an estimated 2.5 billion people in 1950, adding 1 billion people since 2010 and 2 billion since 1998. The world’s population is expected to increase by nearly 2 billion persons in the next 30 years, from the current 8 billion to 9.7 billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 10.4 billion in the mid-2080s.
India’s population has just reached 1.4 billion people, surpassing China as the world’s most populous nation four years earlier than projected. Spurring this growth is a traditional patriarchal culture in which women’s identity is constrained by the social expectation they bear children.
Across the globe, pronatalist forces undermine women’s autonomy and self-determination. Pronatalism is an underlying driver of the global population growing to 8 billion and counting, with 80 million added each year.
The new UNFPA State of World Population Report is wrong to dismiss “population anxiety” as groundless and assert that “population sizes are neither good nor bad.” Population growth is not good for people or the planet, and anxiety is not an unwarranted response to how it affects us.
Population growth deepens social and economic inequality and has negative impacts on unemployment, housing costs, inflation, infrastructure, resource scarcity, pollution, and well-being. It even fuels resource conflicts and wars.
It’s also one of the key variables determining overall consumption and pollution levels, which are jeopardizing planetary life support systems on which we and Earth’s remaining biodiversity depend.
Population growth is a significant factor in climate change according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Over the past three decades, it has cancelled out most climate gains from renewables and efficiency.
Going forward, population growth will be concentrated in the developing world. Dismissing its environmental impacts betrays an assumption that low-income populations in the Global South will stay that way.
This is false as well as unjust. Across the globe, the middle class is the fastest-growing segment of the population, projected to grow another billion to reach 5 billion by 2030. This will bring better living standards for a billion of today’s poor. But we must recognize that it will also bring more peril to an already overburdened planet.
Beyond its impacts on GHG emissions and the climate, population growth also drives broader “overshoot,” meaning that human demands are exceeding Earth’s regenerative capacity.
Currently, we consume 75 percent more than the Earth can provide sustainably, resulting in unprecedented biodiversity loss and an extinction crisis, dwindling freshwater supplies, ocean acidification, expanding desertification, and resource scarcity.
Much of this damage comes from our global food systems, which are directly tied to population growth, and which have already transformed at least 40 percent of the planet’s ice-free land area. They are the primary threat to 86 percent of endangered species.
Much of agriculture’s negative impact is due to the Green Revolution, which is often invoked to inspire confidence that human ingenuity can solve the problems associated with population growth.
But the Green Revolution has posed wicked problems of its own, including deforestation, damaging soil health and the nutritional content of food, and agrochemical pollution. In the Global South, where these problems are especially acute, it has failed to improve health and well-being.
Similarly, faith in green technology, including the unfounded belief renewable energy will somehow decouple growth from environmental damage, ignores real-world negative impacts which disproportionately affect poor people and frontline communities.
Scaling up massive clean energy infrastructure without working to downsize demand wreaks environmental devastation. So does mining toxic rare earth metals, dirty and dangerous work which is done in slave-like conditions by people in the Global South.
The UNFPA report displays this kind of misplaced faith in technology and human ingenuity. Such faith is rooted in a bias toward endless economic growth, propagated by those who have most benefited from the current economic system and who are already wealthy. It ignores the ecological unraveling of continued human expansionism, and the massive toll it takes on human well-being.
According to the IPCC, the climate crisis will lead to increased death and illness from extreme weather and heat waves, growing agricultural losses, destruction of small island states, debilitating drought, declining freshwater supplies, and escalating losses of marine and terrestrial biodiversity.
Over a billion people are expected to be climate refugees by 2050.
From climate change, violence, and conflict to decreased economic opportunity, population growth’s impacts are felt most acutely by women, whose status in developing countries is already low, and by children, including those yet to be born. UNICEF calls the outlook for a billion children in climate-vulnerable countries “unimaginably dire.”
In a time when no government climate plans are on track to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, and we are witnessing a human-driven mass extinction event, dismissing the profound impacts of population growth is shockingly irresponsible.
The UNFPA makes this mistake. It seeks to champion reproductive rights, yet dismisses the importance of population growth, which is driven by patriarchal pronatalist forces that pressure women into obsolete gender roles and abrogate their rights.
Failure to make this connection between rights and growth is the report’s most disappointing aspect.
Population deceleration and human rights go together; we need to advocate both. They are both achievable by the same set of human rights-based policies: universal education, women’s empowerment, children’s rights, and free, state-of-the-art family planning for all.
Truly advancing the causes of human rights and ecological sustainability requires humanity to shrink our population and our economies. It’s our only chance to achieve a high standard of living for all while staying within planetary boundaries.
|
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Nandita Bajaj is the executive director of Population Balance and co-host of The Overpopulation Podcast. She also teaches the first graduate course of its kind: Pronatalism, Overpopulation, and the Planet, through the Institute for Humane Education at Antioch University.
|
![[groups_small]](groups_small.gif)