Mother Pelican
A Journal of Solidarity and Sustainability

Vol. 17, No. 12, December 2021
Luis T. Gutiérrez, Editor
Home Page


4 BCE ~ The Beginning of the End of Patriarchy

4 BCE, the year when Jesus of Nazareth was born in Bethlehem of Judah, was the beginning of the end of patriarchy, the mindset of domination by brute force that had prevailed since time immemorial. Twenty centuries later, dismantling the patriarchal mindset is not yet finished, but the signs of the times are promising. Patriarchal gender ideology has been shown to be a false anthropology. Religious patriarchy is on the way out. Mother Nature is showing us (via population overshoot, climate change, resource depletion, and other symptoms of ecological overshoot) that human supremacy is a myth. The COP26 summit was another baby step, but a baby step nonetheless. Read Laudato Si'. Read Fratelli Tutti. The way forward is the way of sustainable solidarity, not the way of unsustainable hegemony by any ideology, or any group or race, or any nation, or even any species, including Homo sapiens.
Note: The Adam & Eve cartoon is Copyright © Rex May. Used with permission.

Courtesy of
Peter Donovan at
Soil Carbon Coalition
click image to enlarge






Gaia May Destroy Humans Before We Destroy the Earth
James Lovelock

Ecological Justice Border Crossings ~ Part 3 ~ Techno-Dystopias Breed Children as Collateral Damage
Cara Judea Alhadeff

Wanted: Math Geniuses and Power Engineers to Make a Renewable Grid Possible
Alice Friedemann

"Renewables" Is Not the Generic Solution
Eliza Daley

How Much of the Worsening Energy Crisis Is Due to Depletion?
Richard Heinberg

Tech Won't Save Us ~ Shrinking Consumption Will
Andrew Nikiforuk

Returning to a 1970s Economy Could Save Our Future
Andrew Nikiforuk

Fossil Fuel Subsidies: If We Want to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions We Should Not Pay People to Burn Fossil Fuels
Max Roser

Beyond the Growth Imperative
Olaf Bruns

Racial Justice, Climate Justice, and Capitalism in the United States: A Contradiction in Terms
Jacqueline Patterson

The Era of Cheap Living is Over
Jody Tishmack

Market-led Sustainability is a 'Fix that Fails'... But It May Have Been the Necessary 'Defence at First Depth'
Duncan Austin

Conservation or Land Grab? The Financialization of Nature
Ellen Brown

Our Fossil Fuel Energy Predicament, Including Why the Correct Story Is Rarely Told
Gail Tverberg

What the "Supply Chain Problem" is Really About
Dave Pollard

Ending Systems of Domination: Reclaiming Our Bodies and Politics from Global Trauma
Eva Schonveld and Justin Kenrick

Prolegomena to Christian Environmental Ethics ~ Part 1
Walter Scott Stepanenko

Some Practical Thoughts for Young Activists
Rex Weyler

72% of the World's Population Lacks Resource Security, Lives in Ecological Poverty Traps
Mathis Wackernagel et al

Another Extraordinary Delusion: Mining Helium from the Moon
Kurt Cobb

The Domino Theory for Averting Systemic Environmental Collapse
George Monbiot

How Much Energy Do We Need to Achieve a Decent Life for All?
Jarmo Kikstra

Pope Francis and the Steady State Economy
Brian Snyder

From Homo economicus to Homo ecologicus ~ Cultural Evolution During the 21st Century
Luis T. Gutiérrez

Gaia May Destroy Humans Before We Destroy the Earth

James Lovelock

This article was originally published by
The Guardian, 2 November 2021


I don’t know if it is too late for humanity to avert a climate catastrophe, but I am sure there is no chance if we continue to treat global heating and the destruction of nature as separate problems.

That is the wrongheaded approach of the United Nations, which is about to stage one big global conference for the climate in Glasgow, having just finished a different big global conference for biodiversity in Kunming.

This division is as much of a mistake as the error made by universities when they teach chemistry in a different class from biology and physics. It is impossible to understand these subjects in isolation because they are interconnected. The same is true of living organisms that greatly influence the global environment. The composition of the Earth’s atmosphere and the temperature of the surface is actively maintained and regulated by the biosphere, by life, by what the ancient Greeks used to call Gaia.

Almost 60 years ago, I suggested our planet self-regulated like a living organism. I called this the Gaia theory, and was later joined by biologist Lynn Margulis, who also espoused this idea. Both of us were roundly criticised by scientists in academia. I was an outsider, an independent scientist, and the mainstream view then was the neo-Darwinist one that life adapts to the environment, not that the relationship also works in the other direction, as we argued. In the years since, we have seen just how much life – especially human life – can affect the environment. Two genocidal acts – suffocation by greenhouse gases and the clearance of the rainforests – have caused changes on a scale not seen in millions of years.

Because subjects like astronomy, geology, and meteorology are taught separately in schools and universities, few people are aware of the natural forces affecting the Earth’s surface temperature.

For billions of years the Earth’s surface temperature has been determined mainly by the radiant heat coming from the sun. This energy increased over time because it is the nature of stars like the sun to increase their heat output as they grow older. But temperatures on Earth remained relatively stable thanks to Gaia: forests, oceans and other elements in the the Earth’s regulating system, which kept the surface temperature fairly constant and near optimal for life.

The global warming that concerns all of us, and which will be discussed this week in Glasgow, includes a great deal of extra heating that comes as a consequence of extracting and burning fossil fuels since about the middle of the 19th century. That releases methane, carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere. They absorb radiant heat and stop it escaping from Earth. This is what causes global warming.

The amount of global warming depends hugely on the properties of water. When cold ice forms, much of it is white snow. This reflects the sunlight back to space and is cooling. But when it is warm, the water vapour in the air is a powerful greenhouse gas that makes it warmer still.

Much of the confusion over global heating comes about because of the huge quantities of heat needed to change the state of water. Few are aware that to melt a gram of ice takes 80 calories, enough heat to raise the temperature of 1ml of water to 80C. Try an ice cube in your boiling hot tea.

Then imagine how much heat was needed to melt large areas of the polar ice cap during the recent summer and how much hotter the world would have been if the ice had not been there. No wonder there is confusion about whether there is global heating or not.

Warnings that once seemed like the doom scenarios of science fiction are now coming to pass. We are entering into a heat age in which the temperature and sea levels will be rising decade by decade until the world becomes unrecognisable. We could also be in for more surprises. Nature is non-linear and unpredictable, never more than at a time of transition.

Lowering these risks and adapting to those we can no longer avoid will require a mobilisation of resources on the scale of a war economy. We have no choice but to reduce the burning of fossil fuels or face even worse consequences.

But we should also not become over-reliant on renewable power, which will leave us with an energy gap. We need to build more nuclear power stations to overcome that, though the greens will first have to get over their overblown fears of radiation.

The dangers are nowhere near as bad as they are often painted. I’ve travelled millions of miles by air, and all that time I have been exposed to levels of radiation that are ten times as great as at ground level. The dangers are exaggerated.

We also need to address the problem of overpopulation and to urgently halt the destruction of tropical forests. Most of all, we need to look at the world in a holistic way.

I am not hopeful of a positive outcome at Cop26, knowing who is participating. I was not invited to Glasgow, though that is hardly a surprise. As well as being 102 years old, I am an independent scientist, and the university academics have never been comfortable with that.

But my fellow humans must learn to live in partnership with the Earth, otherwise the rest of creation will, as part of Gaia, unconsciously move the Earth to a new state in which humans may no longer be welcome. The virus, Covid-19, may well have been one negative feedback. Gaia will try harder next time with something even nastier.


James Lovelock is the originator of Gaia theory and the author of many books on ecology, human ecology, and industrial ecology. His latest book is Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence. This op-ed was told to Jonathan Watts, the Guardian's global environment editor.


"The scientifically necessary is politically unfeasible,
the politically feasible is scientifically irrelevant."

William Rees (b. 1943)


Write to the Editor
Send email to Subscribe
Send email to Unsubscribe
Link to the Google Groups Website
Link to the PelicanWeb Home Page

Creative Commons License
ISSN 2165-9672

Page 1      



Subscribe to the
Mother Pelican Journal
via the Solidarity-Sustainability Group

Enter your email address: