Mother Pelican
A Journal of Solidarity and Sustainability

Vol. 14, No. 2, February 2018
Luis T. Gutiérrez, Editor
Home Page
Front Page


The Population Crisis – A Call to Arms

Part I

Eric Rimmer

Originally published by
Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere, 28 November 2017
under a Creative Commons License

I Can't See You... by Peter | Flickr | CC BY-SA 2.0

Paul Ehrlich could not have known when he wrote The Population Bomb with Anne Ehrlich in 1968 that mankind would respond by investing a vast quantity of our precious, shrinking resources to prop up unprecedented levels of population growth, rather than trying to prevent it. He could not have foreseen that the uncountable billions of the invertebrate world would be cut in half, in a matter of 40 years. Fifty years later, he must be appalled that human population has more than doubled, at the expense of all other species and many rare resources!

According to global monitoring data for 452 species, there has been a 45 percent decline in invertebrate populations over the past 40 years. Dirzo, Science (2014)
He must surely be driven to distraction by the global ignorance of these facts, and of their fearful consequences! But like the rest of us, he soldiers on and tries to find a way to influence the dense thickets of human indifference.

We now know that the only way to minimise a huge die-off, and to avert the accompanying environmental destruction, would be to stop and then quickly reverse population growth. We also recognise the arithmetical fact that only universal, voluntary, one-child families could produce that change – however unlikely it is that we could achieve global agreement to it (See Population Workbook).

But we must try – and meanwhile, plan how best to deal with nature’s imposed solution of human deaths rapidly accelerating into billions. And at the same time, we must find the best way to minimise the inevitable war-torn competition for resources, fast-growing starvation, epidemic levels of disease and massive movements of people who in their fight to survive, will not respect any political boundaries.

In considering these threats my heart sinks as I contemplate the millions of men around the world, beating their chests in pride at the number of children they are fathering – not realizing that they are operating a self-destruct mechanism. My attention is drawn to new figures about male fertility – reaching an appalling 13.6 in Niger. It is above 8.5 children per man in half of the 41 sub-Saharan countries for which we have data, and above 10 children in one quarter of them. It is time that we openly confront the males of our species about the incredible global damage they are causing – and about their ancient and outdated belief that females are inherently inferior.

And it is also time that the UN Organisation was able to negotiate the freedom to move from merely supplying population figures, to an active and wholly involved position in fighting population growth. The forces marshaled against our so-far puny efforts to control population are massive and relentless.

As Dr. Glen Barry says:

Gaia, the living biosphere, is infested with humans. Not just any humans, but the type that grow fat and reproduce exponentially by liquidating natural ecosystems. The population bomb has burst and we are seeing daily the predicted consequences of collapse and death in the climate, water, oceans, and on the land. Having spent much of my life working to protect Earth’s last naturally evolved primary forests from logging for inequitable over-consumption, I am today ready to declare defeat. Preserving Earth’s last large old-growth forests is a lost cause as there are simply too many people.”

If we are going to make any real progress on these problems, most of the world must know the true facts – and most of them do not.  Perhaps with UN assistance, we may begin with each of the world’s leaders and then move to influence education systems. How can we expect wide understanding of our plight, if all the facts are not made easily available and are not part of world-wide education systems?

Those facts must include at least:

•  The numbers and distribution of world population.

•  An overview of how these numbers have changed – and are changing.

•  The arithmetic facts about the necessity for one-child families.

•  A summary of the world-wide destruction we are wreaking – including climate-change.

To make those facts understandable and credible is a massive challenge for all of us. Let us begin now!

Part II

Originally published by
Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere, 4 January 2017
under a Creative Commons License

Gadarene Swine depicted in an illustration currently on display at the Getty Center | Public Domain

Global Human Population continues to rise, inexorably.

Screen Shot 2018-01-04 at 10.48.03 AM

The rate of increase is 88 million a year – or about 240,000 a day.
Every minute of every day, it looks like this:

If we are to make an impact on population growth. We must slow, then STOP THAT CLOCK!

This provides a slogan, a goal, and a measure of progress!

Assuming we can have a fully active global campaign in place by 2020, and if we made 2030 a target to STOP THE CLOCK – we would have 10 years to achieve an end to human population growth. At a current daily growth rate of 240,000, we would need to slow human population growth by 24,000 year on year for 10 years, or 66 per day. That does not sound like an impossible target!  (After we STOP THE CLOCK we could decide how much further to shrink the population).

However, to bring about the target reduction, it must be fully recognized that only universal one-child families can deliver our goals (see: Population Workbook). That will be an extremely hard sell.

In the poor countries the huge number of births is often the product of beliefs and circumstances that span many centuries, and will be tough to change. However, without the change, many countries are on a suicidal path, and may be induced to recognize that. In the rich countries, the bonus will be a reduction in consumption and CO2 emissions, as well as births.

To achieve any of that, we must influence those that can help to influence others. Possible targets include:

• The United Nations organization

• Each Leader of the 193 UN Member Nations

• World Scientists (They have just issued a Second Warning)

• The so-called “Greens” e.g. WWF

• Population campaign organizations.

• (Are there others?)

Each of those targets would need a specific campaign organization, to be integrated into an overall campaign. Related campaigns, like “World Vasectomy Day”, could be combined with other campaign activities.

As we design an overall campaign, there are many related activities to consider – all ideas are welcome! But everything depends on widespread recognition that we MUST stop and reverse that clock, if we are going to have any chance of averting a massive global tragedy.


Eric Rimmer is a member of the Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere.

|Back to Title|

Page 1      Page 2      Page 3      Page 4      Page 5      Page 6      Page 7      Page 8      Page 9      Page 10

Supplement 1      Supplement 2      Supplement 3      Supplement 4      Supplement 5      Supplement 6

Bookmark and Share

"Prosperity tries the souls of even the wise;
how then should men of depraved character
make a moderate use of victory?"

Gaius Sallustius Crispus (86-35 BCE)


Write to the Editor
Send email to Subscribe
Send email to Unsubscribe
Link to the Google Groups Website
Link to the PelicanWeb Home Page

Creative Commons License
ISSN 2165-9672

Page 4      



Subscribe to the
Mother Pelican Journal
via the Solidarity-Sustainability Group

Enter your email address: