1. The Religious Roots of Gender Violence
Violence Against Women|
in Contemporary World Religion:
Roots And Cures
Daniel C. Maguire
Professor of Moral Theology & Ethics, Marquette University, and President, The Religious Consultation On Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics
Note: The following is quoted (with permission) from Violence Against Women in Contemporary World Religion: Roots And Cures, Daniel C. Maguire and Sa'Diyya Shaikh (Editors), Pilgrim Press, 2007, 248 pages.
Excerpts from Chapter 2, "The Courtroom and the Garden: Gender and Violence in Christendom," by Grace M. Jantzen, pages 32-33:
"The idea of the covenant was taken up by the early Christian writers and given an important place in Christendom as it had in the Hebrew Bible.... Whereas the central ingredient of the Old Covenant is the law, in the New Covenant it is a relationship with Hod mediated by the blood of Christ... It is that new covenant with God through the blood of Christ that is the foundation of Christian theology, already in the New Testament and extending through Christian writing from that day to this ...
"One again, however, a masculinist gender construction lurks just below the surface. As with the Mosaic covenant, the God of the new covenant is a Father God, and Christ is his son: there is no balancing female deity. Even though in Christian theology God's embodiment and hence God's gender are regularly denied, they are as regularly recuperated in the determined refusal to use any but masculine pronouns for God. The fuss that results when someone, exceptionally, goes against this convention... shows just how deeply entrenched are the assumptions that God is (genderless!) male ... Moreover, as with the Mosaic covenant, the rituals of its reennactment have been firmly in male hands...
"The new birth, symbolized by baptism, which is a death to the life begun by birth from a woman, is a birth that has nothing to do with mothers or sex or bodies. Rather, it is a birth from the Father, not of the body but of the spiritual person, and its rites are regulated by the Father's earth;y representatives, who, over the millennia, have been men. Does this constitute gender violence? Not in the overt sense of calling for specific acts of violence against women. But in its relegation of women to inferior or even harmful status, and in blotting out women and women's contributions (even to reproduction) from consciousness, it develops a structure in which gender violence will hardly cause surprise."
Editor's Note: It would be wise as well to examine the impact of patriarchal religious practices on boys and men. The symptoms may be different but, directly or indirectly, religious patriarchy harms men as much as it harms women. A case in point is the current situation in Ireland. Violence begets violence. What goes around comes around. In both religion and society, when 50% of the population dominates the other 50%, 100% of the population is bound to suffer in one way or another. A civilized transition from consumerism to sustainability requires the talents and collaboration of all men and women, heterosexual or homosexual, in all dimensions of human life and across the full range of the gender continuum.
Check this out: The Masculinity Conspiracy, Joseph Gelfer, CreateSpace, 14 August 2011.
2. Heterosexuals and Homosexuals in Religion
Patriarchy preceded all the major religions that exist today, and biased them all from the beginning in favor of heterosexual male hegemony and domination (Cf. Genesis 3:16). This section is a synopsis about the universality of the deeply ingrained prejudice - undoubtedly based on male-only images of God - that must be overcome if organized religion is not to become an obstacle to integral human development.
Two Wings of a Bird: The Equality of Women and Men, Bahá'í International Community, 1999.
- Religious Tolerance, Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 1995-2011.
This web site offers an excellent synopsis (with passage quotations, annotated citations, and links to other web sites) about the status of women in the Bible and in early Christianity. It is structured as follows:
- During Old Testament times, when the roles of women were severely restricted
- Hebrew scripture passages treating women as generally inferior to men
- Hebrew scripture passages treating women as property of men
- Hebrew scripture passages describing women in other negative terms
- Hebrew scripture passages describing women as equal to men (very few)
- Hebrew scripture passages describing women as leaders (but not as religious leaders)
- During Jesus' public ministry to the people of Israel, when the roles of women were severely restricted in accordance with the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) traditions and practices
- Changing roles of women after the execution and resurrection of Jesus (circa 30 CE)
- Regressive statements by Christian religious authorities (all male) after the 2nd century CE
By following these lists of biblical and post-biblical statements, the reader is able to verify the descriptive versus prescriptive passages about women, and the significant discontinuities that must be researched, as pointed out in Section 1.
- The emerging field of women and gender studies now includes issues of men, masculinities, and spirituality. See, for example:
- Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences Between Men and Women, Deborah Blum, Penguin, 1998.
- Does Masculinity Thwart Being Religious?, Edward H. Thompson Jr. and Kathryn R. Remmes, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, September 2002.
- Women, Power, and the Biology of Peace, Judith L. Hand, Questpath Publishing, 2003.
- Biological Differences Between Men and Women With Respect to Social Stability and Aggression, Judith L. Hand, 2006.
- Young Men, Religion and Attitudes Towards Homosexuality, Yasemin Besen and Gilbert Zicklin, Journal of Men, Masculinities and Spirituality, Novermber 2007.
- Guide to Graduate Work in Women's / Gender Studies, Joan Korenman and NWSA, 2009.
- Contemporary Masculine Spiritualities and the Problem of Patriarchy, Joseph Gelfer, Equinox Publishing, 2009.
- The Patriarch's Nuts: Concerning the Testicular Logic of Biblical Hebrew, Roland Boer, Journal of Men, Masculinities and Spirituality, June 2011.
- The Other Side of the Gender Equation: Gender Issues for Men in the Europe and Eurasia Region, Susan D. Somach, KDID Social Transitions, July 2011.
It is important for gender studies to be balanced and include the study of both men and women, heterosexual and homosexual. Gender studies, if properly integrated along the gender continuum, can provide crucial insights to help foster gender equality and gender balance.
- What "America's Pope" thinks of gay marriage, priestly celibacy, and women priests, CBS Sixty Minutes Overtime, 21 August 2011.
On the ordination of women:
Archbishop Dolan: "Jesus gave women positions of responsibility. The only ones at the foot of the cross except for St. John? Women. The people that discovered his resurrection? Women. The people that were with him on his journeys? Women. People say, 'This guy was kind of a pioneer in women's rights.' So, if he were going to intend them for the priesthood, he woulda done it. And he didn't."
Mother Pelican's Response: The good archbishop is offering a specious argument based on a literalist interpretation of gospel texts
taken out of context. There are many things Jesus did 2000 years ago that he wouldn't do today. Would he, in the globalized society of the 21st century, select twelve Jewish men to represent the patriarchs of the twelve tribes of Israel? Likewise, there are many things Jesus didn't do 2000 years ago that he would do today (such as including women among the apostles, since the credibility of women as witnesses now has as much credibility as that of men) and he warned his disciples about thinking that they already knew everything he might do in the future (John 16:12-13).
The Bahá'í religion is a shining exception to the phallic syndrome that prevails in many religious institutions: "The emancipation of women, the achievement of full equality between the sexes, is essential to human progress and the transformation of society. Inequality retards not only the advancement of women but the progress of civilization itself. The persistent denial of equality to one-half of the world's population is an affront to human dignity. It promotes destructive attitudes and habits in men and women that pass from the family to the work place, to political life, and, ultimately, to international relations. On no grounds, moral, biological, or traditional, can inequality be justified. The moral and psychological climate necessary to enable our nation to establish social justice and to contribute to global peace will be created only when women attain full partnership with men in all fields of endeavor." It is noteworthy that the Bahá'ís do not have clergy, so it may have been easier for them to avoid the trap of a male-only hierarchy.
In brief, since their inception most religions have absorbed the patriarchal mindset of male hegemony, and awareness that this isa prejudice to be overcome - rather than a sacred tradition to be conserved and transmitted - is a new phenomenon. Perhaps the impending economic and ecological crises, and the unavoidable need for all humans to collaborate in transitioning to a world of solidarity and sustainability, will induce a religious renewal and help to overcome pseudo-dogmatic resistance to change.
3. Women and Religious Gender Roles in Judaism
Wikipedia article on Women in Judaism:
The role of women in Judaism is determined by the Hebrew Bible, the Oral Law (the corpus of rabbinic literature), by custom, and by non-religious cultural factors. Although the Hebrew Bible and rabbinic literature mention various female role models, religious law treats women differently in various circumstances.
Relatively few women are mentioned in the Bible by name and role, suggesting that they were rarely in the forefront of public life. There are a number of exceptions to this rule, including the Matriarchs Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah, Miriam the prophetess, Deborah the Judge, Huldah the prophetess, Abigail who married David, and Esther. In the Biblical account these women did not meet with opposition for the relatively public presence they had.
According to Jewish tradition, a covenant was formed between the Israelites and the God of Abraham at Mount Sinai. The Torah relates that both Israelite men and Israelite women were present at Sinai, however, the covenant was worded in such a way that it bound men to act upon its requirements and to ensure that the members of their household (wives, children, and slaves) met these requirements as well. In this sense, the covenant bound women as well, though indirectly.
To continue reading the Wikipedia article, click here.
The Wikipedia article includes a very comprehensive bibliography and a directory of links to Jewish religious sources. With regard to current trends on the role of women in Judaism, the following article is very instructive:
4. Women and Religious Gender Roles in Christianity
Wikipedia article on Gender Roles in Christianity:
Gender roles in Christianity vary considerably today as they have during the last two millennia. This is especially true with regards to marriage and ministry.
Christianity traditionally has given men the position of authority in marriage, society and government. This position places women in submissive roles, and usually excludes women from church leadership, especially from formal positions requiring any form of ordination. The Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, and many conservative Protestant denominations assert today that only men can be ordained—as clergy and as deacons.
Many progressive Christians disagree with the traditional "male authority" and "female submission" paradigm. They take a Christian egalitarian or Christian feminist view, holding that the overarching message of Christianity provides positional equality for women in marriage and in ministry. Accordingly, some Protestant churches now ordain women to positions of ecclesiastical leadership.
Despite these emerging theological differences, the majority of Christians regard women with dignity and respect as having been created alongside men in the Image of God. The Bible is seen by many as elevating and honoring women, especially as compared with certain other religions or societies. Women have filled prominent roles in the Church historically, and continue to do so today in spite of significant limitations imposed by ordination restrictions.
To continue reading the Wikipedia article, click here.
Following is a book review of The Lost Moonflower, a novel about Deacon Phoebe of Cenchrae (late 1st century CE) by Issac Karoor.
This novel is about Phoebe, a female deacon in one of the Pauline churches in the early years of Christianity. But it is also about one of the crucial issues in Christian churches today: whether or not women should be ordained to the diaconate, the priesthood, and the episcopate. It is a controversial issue today, as it was when Phoebe was serving the church in Cenchrae (the seaport of Corinth in Greece, late first century CE). Romans 16:1 and Acts 18:18 are at the center of the story, which nevertheless manages to integrate many texts of the New Testament into a tapestry of unlimited divine grace working through humans with limited minds and hearts. Many Protestant churches have gone through the turmoil of ordaining women, and some are still paying the price of internal tensions and bitter debates; patriarchy has a long tail. The Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches still refuse to consider the issue for reasons that only God can judge but surely have nothing to do with divine revelation. Would Jesus today, in our newly "globalized" world, choose to elect twelve male apostles to represent the patriarchs of the twelve tribes of Israel?
The history of Christianity (as documented, for example, in the monumental Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years, by Diarmaid MacCulloch, Viking Press, 2010) is a progression toward deeper understanding of Jesus and his mission (Cf. John 16:12-13), but always in the midst of tensions, misunderstandings and other problems arising from the limitations of the human condition. Patriarchy preceded all the religious traditions that still exist today, and corrupted them all from the very beginning; a corruption that is nowhere more evident than in the Gospels and, in particular, the accounts of how Jesus was crucified by the Romans, at the instigation of the local religious authorities, after a life spent doing good to others and proclaiming God's mercy. The Lost Moonflower is an engaging novel and one that admirably reflects the inner tensions experienced by the early Christian communities; tensions that will continue to challenge the Christian churches as long as they are pilgrims in this world.
The Lost Moonflower could be a source of meditation about the current process of discerning God's will regarding the ordination of women. The Greek Orthodox Church has recently reinstated the ordination of women to the diaconate, albeit only in a very limited way. The Roman Catholic church has not ruled out women deacons, but is not visibly moving forward either. For more information on the cultural and religious issues lurking underneath The Lost Moonflower story, visit the book's web site and check the links to articles on women and their roles as deacons. Given the enormous influence of religion in human affairs, the continued exclusion of women from roles of religious authority is bound to reflect negatively on sustainable human development. If God loves humanity, can this possibly be God's will?
Good News: Women bishops should be allowed, General Synod rules, 12 July 2011
Bad News: Phoenix diocese cathedral won't allow girl altar servers, 21 August 2011
5. Women and Religious Gender Roles in Islam
Wikipedia article on Women in Islam:
The study of women in Islam investigates the role of women within the religion of Islam. The complex relationship between women and Islam is defined by both Islamic texts and the history and culture of the Muslim world. The Qur'an makes it clear that men and women are equal, however the Qu'ran states in 4:34, "Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient and guard in the husband's absence what Allah orders them to guard." Although the Quran does say this, the superiority of men is interpreted in terms of strength by the context - men maintain women. This verse however refers to a relationship between a husband and wife, not in society as a whole.
Sharia (Islamic law) provides for complementarianism, differences between women's and men's roles, rights, and obligations. However neither the Quran nor Hadith mention women have to cook or clean. The majority of Muslim countries give women varying degrees of rights with regards to marriage, divorce, civil rights, legal status, dress code, and education based on different interpretations. Scholars and other commentators vary as to whether they are just and whether they are a correct interpretation of religious imperatives.
To continue reading the Wikipedia article, click here.
Some additional references:
The Women of Islam, Lisa Beyer, Time Magazine, 25 November 2001.
Mauritanian Islamic leaders ban genital mutilation, Mohamed Abdel Wedoud, Magharebia, 15 January 2010.
Women in Islam, Catherine of Siena Virtual College, 2010.
Gender Equity in Islam (Foundations of Spiritual and Human Equity), Jamal Badawi, Islam Online, 29 March 2011.
Gender Equity in Islam (The Economic Aspect), Jamal Badawi, Islam Online, 30 March 2011.
Gender Equity in Islam (The Social Aspect), Jamal Badawi, Islam Online, 4 April 2011.
Gender Equity in Islam (The Legal/Political Aspect), Jamal Badawi, Islam Online, 7 April 2011.
6. Women and Religious Gender Roles in Buddhism
Wikipedia article on Women in Buddhism:
"Women in Buddhism is a topic that can be approached from varied perspectives including those of theology, history, anthropology and feminism. Topical interests include the theological status of women, the treatment of women in Buddhist societies at home and in public, the history of women in Buddhism, and a comparison of the experiences of women across different forms of Buddhism. As in other religions, the experiences of Buddhist women have varied considerably.
"The founder of the religion, Gautama Buddha, permitted women to join his monastic community and fully participate in it, although there were certain provisos or garudhammas. As Susan Murcott has commented: "The nun's sangha was a radical experiment for its time" [Murcott, Susan (1991). The First Buddhist Women:Translations and Commentary on the Therigatha. Parallax Press. page 4.] Dr. Mettanando Bhikkhu says of the First Buddhist council: "Perhaps Mahakassappa and the bhikkhus of that time were jealous of the bhikkhunis being more popular and doing more teaching and social work than the bhikkhus. Their anti-women prejudice became institutionalized at that time with the eight garudhammas, the eight weighty restrictions. We must discontinue that prejudice. There is no anti-women prejudice in Jainism and they survived in India; whereas Buddhism had prejudice and did not survive in India" [see The First Council and Suppression of the Bhikkhuni Order]. Although it must be said that this is factually incorrect, because there are jain sects like the Digambara sect, which believes that women are capable of spiritual progress, but must be reborn male, in order to attain final spiritual liberation. It is also highly doubtful that the garudhammas were motivated by Mahakaasapa's being jealous, as he is said to be an enlightened one and one of the principle disciples of the Buddha. Furthermore there's no support within canon, to suggest that the bhikkunis were more popular, taught more or that they did more social work than Bhikkhus.
"The various schools and traditions within Buddhism hold different views as to the possibilities of women's spiritual attainments. Feminist scholars have also noted than even when a woman's potential for spiritual attainment is acknowledged, records of such achievements may not be kept - or may be obscured by gender-neutral language or mis-translation of original sources by Western scholars. According to Bernard Faure, "Like most clerical discourses, Buddhism is indeed relentlessly misogynist, but as far as misogynist discourses go, it is one of the most flexible and open to multiplicity and contradiction."
To continue reading the Wikipedia article, click here.
Some additional references:
The Place of Women in Buddhism, Swarna de Silva, Enabling Support Foundation, 1994.
A Grand Declaration of Gender Equality, Writings on Buddhism, Soka Gakkai International, 1996.
Full Ordination of Women in Tibetan Buddhism, His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama, July 2007.
Buddhism and Women, BhudaNet (with links to other resources), 2008.
The Position of Women in Buddhism , L.S. Dewaraja, Buddhist Pub Soc, Sri Lanka, 2011.
Ordination of Women in Buddhism, Wikipedia, 2011.
7. Women and Religious Gender Roles in Hinduism
Wikipedia article on Women in Hinduism:
The role of women in Hinduism is often disputed, and positions range from equal status with men to restrictive. Hinduism is based on numerous texts, some of which date back to 2000 BCE or earlier. They are varied in authority, authenticity, content and theme, with the most authoritative being the Vedas. The position of women in Hinduism is widely dependent on the specific text and the context. Positive references are made to the ideal woman in texts such as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, while some texts such as the Manu Smriti advocate a restriction of women's rights. In modern times the Hindu wife has traditionally been regarded as someone who must at all costs remain chaste or pure. This is in contrast with the very different traditions that have prevailed at earlier times in 'Hindu' kingdoms, which included highly respected professional courtesans (such as Amrapali of Vesali), sacred devadasis, mathematicians and female magicians (the basavis, the Tantric kulikas). Some European scholars observed in the nineteenth century Hindu women were "naturally chaste" and "more virtuous" than other women, although what exactly they meant by that is open to dispute. In any case, as male foreigners they would have been denied access to the secret and sacred spaces that women often inhabited. Mahabharata and Manusmriti asserts that gods are delighted only when women are worshiped or honoured, otherwise all spiritual actions become futile.
There is a wide variety of viewpoints within the different schools and sects of Hinduism concerning the exact nature and gender (where applicable) of the Supreme person or being; there are even sects that are skeptical about the existence of such a being. Shaktism, for example, focuses worship on the goddess Devi as the supreme embodiment of power, or Shakti (feminine strength; a female form of God). Vaishnavism and Shaivism both worship Lakshmi with Vishnu and Parvati with Shiva respectively as beings on an equal level of magnitude (the male and female aspects of God). In some instances such as with Gaudiya Vaishnavism, specific emphasis is placed on the worship of God's female aspect (Radharani) even above that of her paramour Krishna. Thus it could be said that Hinduism considers God to have both male and female aspects, as the original source of both.
To continue reading the Wikipedia article, click here.
8. A Biblical Exegesis of Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper
Leonardo Da Vinci's Last Supper
Leonardo Da Vinci was a painter not a theologian
Sister Mary Coloe, PVBM
Australian Catholic University
Originally published in CathNews, 29 June 2011
REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION
Many were astonished at the reported remarks
of Portuguese Cardinal Jose da Cruz Policarpo this week that there is
no "fundamental obstacle" from "a theological perspective" for women to
say the Mass from the altar. One thing that is of great value in the discussion is the opportunity
it gives to re-examine our understanding of Eucharist and to look again
at the Gospel traditions on which our Eucharistic theology is based.
In the New Testament
writings there is no indication of who led or presided when communities
gathered for the "Lord's Supper". Was it one of Jesus' disciples,
one of 'the Twelve', would Paul have led the communities he founded,
would it have been the person who was head of the household where they
We don't have clear evidence to answer these questions. The
first time we hear who led the Eucharist is in the writing called "the Didache"
(the Teaching) dated about the year 100 C.E. In this document people
called 'the prophets' are named as the leaders at Eucharist. "But
permit the prophets to offer thanksgiving as much as they desire" (Did.
10:7; also 13:3).
It is also important to return to the Gospels and to our knowledge of
the Jewish Passover meal to consider questions about who would have
been present with Jesus at this meal. The earliest Gospel, Mark,
situates the meal as a Passover. Mark has Jesus send disciples into
Jerusalem to make the arrangements and Mark writes, "The Teacher asks,
where is my guest room, where I am to eat the Passover with my disciples" (Mark 14:14).
Following the meal, Jesus goes to Mount Olives and Mark records, "They went to a place called Gethsemane and he said to his disciples, "Sit here while I pray" (Mark 14:32)
Note that the focus is on Jesus' disciples. The meal is for his
disciples and these disciples then go with Jesus from the meal to Mt
Olives. The group of disciples is broader than the smaller group
called 'The Twelve". These twelve are singled out primarily for
their symbolic value representing a unified or re-constituted Israel
based again on the twelve tribes.
When Moses seals the covenant at Mt Sinai we read, "Moses rose early
in the morning and built an altar at the foot of the mountain and twelve
pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel" (Exodus 24:4).
There was an animal sacrifice and Moses collected the blood. Half
of this blood was sprinkled on the altar, then the rest was sprinkled
on the people as he said, "This is the blood of the covenant which the
Lord has made with you" (Exodus 24:8)
In the context of a Jewish Passover meal, where the whole household
gathers to celebrate the covenant and Israel's relationship with God,
Jesus ritualises the new covenant.
It is unthinkable that a Jewish Passover would involve only
men. Women and children as part of the household all have a role
to play. The women prepare the food and are entrusted to do this
according to strict kosher rules, the head of the household goes to the
Temple to sacrifice the lamb, the woman begins the meal with the
lighting of the candles, the children ask questions about what is
happening and so provide a way of telling the great story of the first
Passover. It is a joyous, noisy, family celebration.
When Mark's Gospel highlights the Twelve, within the context of this
household meal, it is to recall the original Sinai covenant. It is
to make the connection between what Jesus is doing now and what Moses
did. Mark even records that Jesus uses the same words spoken by Moses,
"This is my blood of the covenant" (Exodus 24:8; Mark 14:24).
The passage called the 'institution narrative' resonates with the
symbolism of Sinai. But to read into this passage a literal
exclusive gathering of only twelve men is to misread the entire Markan
passage which as noted above is set within discipleship language.
Schematically it looks like this:
Where am I to eat the Passover with my disciples?
The covenant ritual: The twelve, the blood of the covenant.
Jesus said to his disciples, "Sit here while I pray."
Taking seriously what Mark writes and his rich covenantal theology
that goes back to Israel's experience of Passover and the Sinai
ritualising of this experience by Moses, means it is not accurate to
imagine that Jesus was seated at table only with 12 men, excluding all
the other disciples.
Unfortunately, most of us have been so influenced by the Da Vinci
painting of the "Last Supper" that we take this painting as a
historically reliable portrait of a first century Jewish Passover meal.
For all its beauty and artistry, Leonardo cannot be the basis for our
Eucharistic theology, particularly if it leads to imagining that Jesus'
sharing of this meal was exclusive of most of his followers.
And, among some of these followers Mark notes, "There were also women
looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the
mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome, who when he was in
Galilee followed him and ministered to him; and also many other women
who came up with him to Jerusalem" (Mark 15:40-41).
I welcome the Cardinal's comments and the discussion that has
followed, particularly if it provokes what Vatican II called a "return
to the sources" of our theological thinking and practice. These sources
need to move beyond Da Vinci, and return to the New Testament and the
early traditions using the best critical and historical methods we now
have, that previous generations did not have access to.
Dr. Mary Coloe is a Presentation Sister lecturing in Scripture at Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. She has an article on women in the New Testament in a forthcoming issue of Compass Theology Review.
Editor's Note: See also Lisbon cardinal summoned to Rome following ordination comments, CathNews, 9 August 2011. Obviously, the Vatican curia was not pleased with the Cardinal's candid remarks.
9. Amrutha - A Theological Novel by John Wijngaards
"Monsignor Shamus McKenna, 'Muss' to his friends, serves the Pope in Rome as theological adviser. His job requires him to uphold the medieval doctrine of natural law which recent Popes have imposed on all Catholics. When Muss enters the real world, he is in for a shock.
"The sexual ethics of "Natural Law" have created havoc in the Catholic world. Married couples may never use the pill or a condom. Gay partners are forbidden any form of sexual intimacy. Women are mothers by nature and not suitable for the priesthood . . . .
"Carrying out his unusual research Muss faces one risky challenge after the other. He delves into dark recesses of human sexuality. He finds out what women are really like, and falls in love. He becomes a husband and father.
"But will he ever escape the menacing, stifling, suffocating stranglehold of the LAW OF NATURE?!"
To get a copy of the book, click here.
"Past Catholic morality has been tainted with negative views on sexuality. On this site we present a balanced view, supported by modern Catholic theology. We try to preserve a healthy balance, asserting that sex is good & sacred, avoiding left and right extremes:"
New Focus in Catholic Sexual Morality
- 1. The shift from ontological constructs of gender, marriage and sexuality to the experiential discovery of gender, marriage and sexuality.
- 2. The shift from 'Augustinian' dualism to celebrating the marvelous gift of body, gender and sex
- 3. The shift from law-centered sexual ethics to person-centered sexual ethics
To read this sections, click here.
The Controversy about Natural Law
- Background information about 'Natural Law'
- Medieval views based on the work of Thomas Aquinas
- The natural law of sex
- The tyranny of the Catholic Church's sexual ethics
- The thinking of Church leaders fails
- Human intelligence is natural law for us
To read this sections, click here.