HOME
LOGO
MISSION
RESEARCH
LINKS
NEWS
TOOLS
LETTERS
DOWNLOADS
ARCHIVE
CALL FOR PAPERS
FREE SUBSCRIPTION
SELECTED EDUCATION RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
(click on the images for more info)
EARTH CHARTER
EARTH CHARTER ESD
MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
MAP OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE
INTERNET ARCHIVE
WIKIPEDIA
UNITED NATIONS
UNESCO ESD
UNESCO ESD GOOD PRACTICES
UNU IAS ESD
UNU GEIC ESD
GENDER EQUALITY
TWO WINGS OF A BIRD
SIENA VIRTUAL COLLEGE
UNICEF's PHOTOS OF THE YEAR
SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP
MEDIA GLOBAL
GLOBAL FOOTPRINT
WORLD ENV ORG
BIBLE GATEWAY
QURAN GATEWAY
SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESEARCH
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
ECOLOGICAL INTERNET
FACING THE FUTURE EDUCATION RESOURCES
WEBQUEST EDUCATION RESOURCES
EARTH INSTITUTE
ESD TOOLKIT
GEOGRAPHY OF HUNGER
DIVINE COMMUNION
WORLD COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES
ISLAM
JUDAISM
BAHÁ'Í
GIRARDIAN BIBLICAL REFLECTIONS
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE
BCCA IEF ESD
IISD ESD
GDAE ESD
INTUTE
WCESD APRIL 2009
UNDP HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
UNDP HDR 2009
WORLD BANK
GCAP
ISER
IFPRI
DEV ORGS
IICD
OECD
ELDIS
GSDRC
PEP NET
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH
WORLD GOVERNMENTS
WORLD UNIVERSITIES
GLOBAL NONKILLING
WORLD NEWSPAPERS
PLANET 2025
SHAPING TOMORROW
WORLD FUTURES
LITTLE EARTH SHOW
PAINT FOR THE PLANET
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
NEW CIVILIZATION NETWORK
DAMIETTA PEACE INITIATIVE
SLUM DWELLERS INTERNATIONAL
INTEGRAL ECOLOGY CENTER
MICAH CHALLENGE
GRIST MAGAZINE
PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
LEARNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE LIVING
PLANET GREEN
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
INTEGRAL INSTITUTE
DEVELOPMENT CROSSING
WORLD DIGITAL LIBRARY
OXFORD OPHI
USP ESD
LANGUAGE OF THE HEART
UNFCCC
CLIMATE CONF
COPENHAGEN
DECEMBER 2009
|
Education for Sustainable Development - Part 3
SUMMARY
This issue is Part 3 of the series on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). It provides a report on Versions 0 and 1 of the ESD consultation and the preparation of Version 1.5 of the consultation. As of 24 April 2009, 61 persons had taken the V0 test survey. As of 27 May 2009, 129 persons had taken the V1 test survey. This issue revisits the "lessons learned" in V0 and attempts to isolate the "lessons learned" in V1.
The "lessons learned" in V1 are as follows:
Both V0 and V1 yield high rankings for the eight UNESCO categories.
Most responses are in favor of overcoming patriarchy in secular institutions, and many are also in favor of overcoming patriarchy in religious institutions.
The dominant reason for people not to take good care of their own health is poverty (lack of access, lack of affordability).
There is a remarkable consensus on the need to overcome addictive consumerism and refocus on improving social and environmental justice.
The high percentage of participants in favor of "checks and balances" may be indicative a wider understanding of the principle of subsidiarity.
Not surprisingly, most responders are in favor of cultural diversity. But there seems to be a reluctance to openly make choices pursuant to overcoming gender discrimination.
It is now commonplace (at least in democracies) to discuss secular abuses of power; but discussing abuses of religious power (including gender violence) is still taboo in many cultures and institutions.
Most people now live in cities and therefore have a vested interest in cities becoming sustainable. But very few people are ready to tolerate pigs and chickens running around in the neighborhood.
The high percentages in favor of embracing a simpler lifestyle and moderating their own consumption habits are very encouraging. But it is hard to envision these changes propagating without massive social and cultural support.
The survey instrument has been carefully revised in response to feedback received in V0 and V1. Version 1.5 is a revised version of Version 1, and still considered a test version. It is hoped that Version 1.5 will pave the way for a V2 "beta test" and, subsequently, a V3 instrument worthy of wider distribution and a longer test period. It would be great if those who participated in the V0 and V1 tests can also participate in the V1.5 test. In addition, it is hoped that many more subscribers will participate in the Version 1.5 test. Again there are 40 questions (5 for each of the 8 UNESCO categories) and it takes about one hour. These are the links for Version 1.5:
The questionnaire design is stable. V1.1 is V1 with a brief clarification added regarding the intent of the "multiple choice" questions. The Version 1.5 questionnaire continues to be based on Paulo Freire's educational philosophy (iterative questions and answers pursuant to "learning by doing") and Ken Wilber's integral theory (the AQAL model - All Quadrants, All Levels) in order to minimize "elitist" bias and maximize coverage of all relevant issues in ESD. Please write to this email address if you have any questions, suggestions, or problems using the V1.5 questionnaire.
In brief, this issue includes the following:
In page 1, an update on the ESD consultation project, including:
- In section 1, a digest of the V0 preliminary test
- In section 2, a digest of the V0 analysis report,
- In section 3, a digest of the V1 revised test
- In section 4, a digest of the V1 analysis report
- In section 5, a combined assessment of the V0 and V1 tests
- In section 6, the V1.5 test based on V0 and V1 feedback
- In section 7, the evolution of the V0, V1, and V1.5 consultation forms
- In section 8, an updated plan for stepwise refinement of the survey
- In section 9, some suggestions for prayer, study, and action
In page 2, an excellent and very timely invited paper:
|
| |
1. Digest of the V0 Preliminary Test
Full documentation of the V0 preliminary test can be found in the following URLs:
The following is a summary of "lessons learned" in Version 0 of the ESD consultation:
Confirmation that sustainable development is the only feasible way forward for humanity
Confirmation that education for sustainable development is the most urgent priority
Confirmation that the each of the UNESCO areas for ESD is highly relevant
Confirmation that sustainable development is more than just a matter of balancing material resource flows
Confirmation that sustainable ***human development*** is the core of sustainable development
Finding that ESD is rarely perceived to require a shift from traditional education to "learn by doing"
Finding that SD is mostly perceived as a collective problem beyond the reach of individual initiatives
Feedback to the effect that the survey questionnaire is too long and takes over an hour to complete
Feedback to the effect that the language of the survey questionnaire needs careful editing to minimize bias
Feedback to the effect that the survey questionnaire needs improvement to maximize coverage of all issues
The term "lessons learned" may be too strong. Any lessons learned in this process are "lessons tentatively learned." Lessons "learned" in one test may be "unlearned" in subsequent tests. It should be clearly understood that there are no certainties in sustainable development. Furthermore, it should be clearly understood that the objective of this consultation is to gather requirements for ESD. These requirements must be articulated as issues or problem areas that are to be considered and discussed in ESD programs. In other words, the objective of this consultation is not to arrive at practical solutions (let alone "the" solution) to any of the complex issues related to sustainable development. However, a good inventory and taxonomy of relevant issues might be useful.
2. Digest of the V0 Analysis Report
The V0 questionnaire has been posted. Likewise, the V0 spreadsheet of questions and answers is available online. The Google summary report for V0 is also available. A detailed analysis of V0 test results was also included in the May 2009 issue. The usefulness of so much commentary at this early stage is debatable. The histograms are the most informative way to visualize the results. Some readers may want to download the V0 spreadsheet to do further analysis on their own.
3. Digest of the V1 Revised Test
Full documentation of the V1 revised test can be found in the following URLs:
The revision of the V0 questionnaire for the V1 iteration was reported in Section 7 of the May 2009 issue. A chart was provided that captures the structural changes between V0 and V1. Further down the reader will find an extension of this chart that shows the structural changes between V1 and V1.5. Basically, V1 provided further survey design structure by including questions related to each quadrant of Wilber's AQAL model. All the quadrant-related questions in V1 were multiple choice and required the selection of the "best answer."
4. Analysis of V1 Test Results
The V1 questionnaire has been posted. Likewise, the V1 spreadsheet of questions and answers is available online. The Google summary report for V1 is also available. As for V0, the histograms are the most informative way to visualize the results for V1. Some readers may want to download the V1 spreadsheet to do further analysis on their own.
Many participants had tantrums with the "multiple choice, select the best answer" approach, as they felt it was "elitist" and incompatible with Freire's educational philosophy of open-ended questions. Nevertheless, the following "lessons tentatively learned" emerged during the analysis of the V1 spreadsheet and histograms:
The following are the average relevance rankings for the eight UNESCO priorities:
The following are the most frequent choices for gender equity:
The following are the most frequent choices for health care:
- [Question 7] [F] All the above ~ 40%, and [A] Many people take health for granted until they become sick ~ 37%
- [Question 8] [E] B, C, and D above but not A ~ 67%, and [B] Avoid polluting the environment ~ 22%
- [Question 9] [A] Reformation of health care systems so as to make health care more accessible and affordable ~ 54%
- [Question 10] [E] Recognition that psychological violence is at least as bad as physical violence in causing mental illness ~ 31%
The dominant reason for people not to take good care of their own health is poverty (lack of access, lack of affordability), and there is increasing recognition of the negative health impacts of psychological violence.
The following are the most frequent choices for environmental stewardship:
The following are the most frequent choices for rural development:
The following are the most frequent choices for cultural diversity:
- [Question 22] [C] Ignorance that breeds intolerance ~ 36%, and [E] Lack of experience in the benefits of cultural diversity ~ 26%.
- [Question 23] [D] Promote diversity (including gender balance) in the workplace and other secular institutions ~ 53%
- [Question 24] [F] All the above ~ 47%, but the dominant entry is [B] Increase financial support for gender studies, ethnic studies, and other studies that help young people gain an appreciation for cultural diversity, the positive value of inclusiveness, and the negative value of exclusiveness ~ 32%
- [Question 35] [C] Overcoming collective delusions about any form of superiority or supremacy ~ 47%
Not surprisingly, most responders are in favor of cultural diversity. But while the consensus is strong is favor of fostering some forms of fostering cultural diversity, it is still weak for others. Specifically, there seems to be a reluctance to select options pursuant to overcoming gender discrimination, which is the most universal (and harmful?) way of suppressing diversity.
The following are the most frequent choices for human security:
- [Question 27] [E] A, B, and D above but not C ~ 52%, and [B] The desire for power ~ 31%.
- [Question 28] [C] Work for social and environmental justice ~ 37%, [A] Teach and practice the power of nonviolence ~ 28%, and [D] Work to close the gap between the very rich and the very poor ~ 20%
- [Question 29] [D] Create incentives for nonviolence and disincentives for violence at all levels, 37%, [B] Democratic reforms with effective "checks and balances" at all levels (principle of subsidiarity) ~ 26%, and [E] Educate children on the Declaration of Human Rights, the Earth Charter, and the Hannover Principles ~ 20%
- [Question 30] [E] Both A and B above but not C and D ~ 33%, where [A] Make war and violence "collectively unacceptable" and [B] Make the rich-poor gap "collectively unacceptable," and [F] Both C and D, where [C] Choice A with especial emphasis on gender violence, and [D] Choice B with especial emphasis on gender violence.
The desire for power is universally dominant. There seems to be a dichotomy between thinking about power in secular affairs and thinking about power in domestic and religious affairs. Power and violence are good bedfellows. This is especially the case when power is absolute ("power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"). Patriarchy is a form of absolute power. At this point in human history, it has become commonplace (at least in democracies) to discuss abuses derived from secular forms power; but discussing patriarchal religious power and gender violence (the most universal form of violence) is still taboo in many cultures and institutions.
The following are the most frequent choices for sustainable urbanization:
- [Question 32] [D] Uncontrolled growth ~ 34%, and [C] The attraction of urban jobs, resources, and amenities ~ 19%
- [Question 33] [A] Do research on incentives for mitigation of urban growth ~ 40%, and [C] Support developing massive transit systems to avoid commuting ~ 33%
- [Question 34] [B] Reverse migration from rural to urban areas by making rural living more attractive -- economically and socially ~ 77%
- [Question 35] [G] All the above ~ 33%, and [H] A, B, C, and D above but not E and F ~ 33%, where [E] More toleration for people who start growing fruits and vegetables in their gardens, and [F] More toleration for people who start having chickens, pigs, etc., in their backyards.
Most people now live in cities and therefore have a vested interest in cities becoming sustainable. Supplying cities with food and other commodities is a critical issue, as the economic and environmental costs of transportation are becoming increasingly unsustainable. But very few people are ready to tolerate pigs and chickens running around in the neighborhood.
The following are the most frequent choices for sustainable consumption:
- [Question 37] [D] Lack of appreciation for a simple lifestyle ~ 43%
- [Question 38] [E] Start by moderating your own consumption habits ~ 63%
- [Question 39] [H] All the above ~ 59%, where "all the above" are choices for "society to do something."
- [Question 40] [E] All the above ~62%, where "all the above" are choices for better recognition of something "by everyone."
The high percentages in favor of embracing a simpler lifestyle and moderating their own consumption habits are very encouraging. But the high percentages who are willing to rely on amorphous collective efforts devoid of leadership are very discouraging. It is hard to envision many people embracing a simpler lifestyle, and moderating their own consumption habits, without massive social and cultural support.
The "lessons tentatively learned" in V1 are the summary statements in red embedded in the preceding list. It cannot be overemphasized that the objective of this consultation is to gather requirements for ESD. These requirements must be articulated as issues or problem areas that sustainable development practitioners have to deal with, and therefore must be considered and discussed in ESD programs. This exercise is not about formulating practical solutions (let alone "the" solution) to any of the complex issues related to sustainable development. At the moment, a more modest (but perhaps feasible) objective is to gather a good inventory. If the inventory of issues could be organized as a taxonomy, with each issue linked to applicable knowledge resources, then it might become more useful. But first we need a good inventory of issues. Needless to say, the inventory of issues should be amenable to accommodating new issues as they emerge.
5. Combined Assessment of the V0 and V1 Tests
As of 24 April 2009, the V0 survey had been completed by 61 participants. As of 27 May 2009, the V1 survey had been completed by 129 participants. So the number of participants doubled. But the distribution of participants by role in sustainable development is very similar for V0 and V1:
Figure 1. Participation by Role in Sustainable Development - V0 and V1
People could select more than one role, so the numbers add up to more than 61 for V0 and more than 129 for V1, but the distributions are very similar, with most of the participants being researchers and educators. There is a good representation of volunteers and consultants, but very few executives and government officials participating thus far. The combined analysis of V0 and V1 results leads to further refinement of both the question formats and the underlying Freire-Wilber design.
- Freire's method of iterative questions and answers remains as the intrinsic educational philosophy. This means that the iterative succession of questions and answers is always open to adaptation and is never constrained by elitist agendas.
- Wilber's AQAL model is used to improve coverage of all pertinent issues in the consultation questionnaire. This means that the questionnaire must take into account the individual-interior, collective-interior, individual-exterior, and collective-exterior quadrants.
- Within each quadrant of the AQAL model, attention is focused in the eight areas prescribed by UNESCO. This means that there must be at least eight questions for each of the quadrants, one for each of UNESCO's key educational themes.
QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN
Let us consider first the continuing refinement of the underlying questionnaire design. Wilber proposes an integral model of reality with four quadrants. At this point, the reader may want to revisit the May issue, Section 4 and supporting references.
A basic visualization of Wilber's integral theory is as follows:
Upper-Left Quadrant (ULQ)
CONSCIOUSNESS
"I" Interior-Individual Intentional
|
Upper-Right Quadrant (URQ)
BEHAVIOR
"It" Exterior-Individual Behavioral
|
Lower-Left Quadrant (LLQ)
CULTURE
"We" Interior-Collective Cultural
|
Lower-Right Quadrant (LRQ)
SYSTEMS
"Its" Exterior-Collective Social
|
Figure 2. The AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) Integral Theory
Adapted from Ken Wilber, Wikipedia, 2009
Reference: Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice, Ken Wilber, Integral Institute, 2004.
An "unsustainable world" interpretation of the four quadrants is as follows:
Upper-Left Quadrant (ULQ)
EGOCENTRIC MATERIALISTIC
DESIRE FOR GRATIFICATION
Sources:
Jesus,
Bahaullah,
Freud,
Jung
|
Upper-Right Quadrant (URQ)
MOSTLY SELF-SERVING SELDOM FOR OTHERS
EXTRAVAGANT CONSUMPTION
Sources:
Skinner,
Pesch,
Gorbachev,
Girard
|
Lower-Left Quadrant (LLQ)
UNHEALTHY LIFESTYLES
CULTURE OF CONSUMERISM
Sources:
Carson,
Brundtland,
Fey&Lam,
Komiyama
|
Lower-Right Quadrant (LRQ)
HIERARCHY IN GOVERNANCE
UNSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sources:
Taparelli,
Ketteler,
Bosnich,
Monsma
|
Figure 3. AQAL Model of the World as of 2009
Adapted from Ken Wilber, Wikipedia, 2009
Reference: Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice, Ken Wilber, Integral Institute, 2004.
A "sustainable world" interpretation of the four quadrants is as follows:
Upper-Left Quadrant (ULQ)
SPIRITUALITY INNER JOURNEY
DESIRE FOR PEACE WITH JUSTICE
Sources:
Jesus,
Bahaullah,
Freud,
Jung
|
Upper-Right Quadrant (URQ)
SOLIDARITY ACTING PERSON
MODERATE CONSUMPTION
Sources:
Skinner,
Pesch,
Gorbachev,
Girard
|
Lower-Left Quadrant (LLQ)
HEALTHIER LIFESTYLES
CULTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY
Sources:
Carson,
Brundtland,
Fey&Lam,
Komiyama
|
Lower-Right Quadrant (LRQ)
SUBSIDIARITY IN GOVERNANCE
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sources:
Taparelli,
Ketteler,
Bosnich,
Monsma
|
Figure 4. AQAL Model of a Sustainable World
Adapted from The Four Worlds of Sustainability, Barrett Brown, Integral Institute, 2007
References:
Integral Sustainability 101, Barrett Brown, Integral Sustainability Center, Integral Institute, 2004.
Theory and Practice of Integral Sustainable Development - Part 1: Quadrants and the Practitioner, Barrett Brown, Integral Institute, AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1 (2), 2005, pp. 351-386.
Theory and Practice of Integral Sustainable Development - Part 2: Values, Developmental Levels, and Natural Design, Barrett Brown, Integral Institute, AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1 (2), 2005, pp. 368-448.
The Four Worlds of Sustainability: Drawing Upon Four Universal Perspectives to Support Sustainability Initiatives, Barrett Brown, Integral Sustainability Center, Integral Institute, 2007.
|
Figure 4 represents a situation of solidarity and sustainability as might be reached in the future, after the right incentives have translated the common good requirements so they become part of self-interest, the power of nonviolence prevails, there is harmony between humans and the human habitat, and the culture of consumerism has been translated into a culture of both social and environmental justice. Utopian perhaps, but utopias are worth working for if the end result is a still imperfect but better (and sustainable!) world.
COMPOSITION OF QUESTIONS
The V0 questionnaire attempted to mimic Freire's "Qs & As" educational model for each of the eight UNESCO priorities. There was a mix of several kinds of questions, such as "ranking," "select all that apply," and "essay." The V1 questionnaire added Wilber's structuring to the questions under each of the eight UNESCO categories. For each category, there was a "relevance ranking" question and four "multiple choice" questions (one for each of the AQAL quadrants). The feedback received from many participants is that the "multiple choice, select the best answer" questions were too restrictive. Most participants also missed the opportunity to enter their own ideas to foster sustainable development, as allowed by the V0 survey form. The participant's feedback also included the need to minimize bias. The process of refining the questions to maximize neutrality will be a continuing effort.
6. ESD Consultation V1.5 Revised Test
Per the previous section, a relaxation of the "multiple choice, select the best answer" questions is required. As before, V1.5 will include five questions for each one of the UNESCO educational categories:
- The 1st question will check the relevance of the UNESCO "key theme"
- The 2nd question will cover issues from the perspective of the ULQ
- The 3rd question will cover issues from the perspective of the URQ
- The 4th question will cover issues from the perspective of the LRQ
- The 5th question will cover issues from the perspective of the LLQ
And, again as in V1, the first question will ask for a "relevance ranking" of the UNESCO themes. Version 1.5 again includes 5 questions for each UNESCO key area, for a total of 40 questions. In each group of 5, the first question is a "relevance ranking" of the UNESCO key area, where "relevance" means "relevance for sustainable development." The second question requires selecting one root cause from a list but allows the participant to enter another root cause. The format of the third, fourth, and fifth questions is "select all the options that apply and/or enter an additional option."
It is hoped that Version 1.5 will yield a more complete inventory of options to be considered for each quadrant. In this exercise we are thinking in global terms, and we are also attempting to think "outside the box." The ultimate goal is to develop a globally useful instrument that can be further refined by locality, country, region, and culture.
7. Evolution of the V0, V1, and V1.5 Forms
Successive monthly iterations of the survey must be versioned. It is important to track the questionnaire changes from version to version, as this is the only way to understand changes in the answers over space and time. To continue this process, Figure 5 is a comparison of the questionnaire designs for V0, V1, and V1.5:
Figure 5. ESD Consultation Forms, Versions 0, 1, and 1.5
NOTATION:
Qs = Questions, As = Answers
MC = Multiple Choice, AA = All that Apply
MC+ = Multiple Choice + Enter Choice
AA+ = All that Apply + Enter Choice
ULQ = Upper Left Quadrant (Individual Conscience)
URQ = Upper Right Quadrant (Individual Behavior)
LRQ = Lower Right Quadrant (Collective Systems)
LLQ = Lower Left Quadrant (Collective Culture)
|
In brief, Version 0 included five questions for each area, the area relevance rating question and four additional questions pertaining to the area. Version 1 also included five questions for each area, but the area relevance rating question was followed by four "multiple choice" questions that pertain to the area, one from the perspective of each quadrant. Version 1.5 again includes 5 questions for each UNESCO key area, for a total of 40 questions. In each group of 5, the first question is a "relevance ranking" of the UNESCO key area, where "relevance" means "relevance for sustainable development." The second question requires selecting one root cause from a list but allows the participant to enter another root cause. The format of the third, fourth, and fifth questions is "select all the options that apply and/or enter an additional option."
8. Updated Plan for Stepwise Refinement
The following documentation is available to keep track of the stepwise refinement process:
FIRST ITERATION - VERSION 0 - APRIL 2009
SECOND ITERATION - VERSION 1.0/1.1 - MAY 2009
THIRD ITERATION - VERSION 1.5 - JUNE 2009
The results of this revised test will be reported in the July issue. The plan is to do stepwise refinement of the consultation form in monthly (quarterly?) iterations. Each iteration will be versioned and analyzed. Each iteration will bring to the surface deficiencies to be fixed and, hopefully, some additional insights. Convergence on a well tested and validated consultation form may take several iterations. Then we can attempt to bring the survey to the attention of a wider audience. Your patience and continued collaboration are respectfully requested. To participate in the version 1.5 test, click on the link below to access the revised consultation form.
ONLINE CONSULTATION FORM V1.5
Remember to click on "submit" at the end so that your answers are recorded. Going forward, the plan is to version the succession of iterations. Specifically, the survey form (questionnaire), the spreadsheet database, (collected answers), and the summary report (analysis of questions and answers) will be versioned. Transparency is the name of the game.
9. Prayer, Study, and Action
Prayer
|
September 20, 2009
International Day of Prayer and Action for Human Habitat
Source: Habitat for Humanity
|
Action
|
Take time (one hour?) to participate in the
Consultation on Education for Sustainable Development
The following educational goals are covered:
This is the link:
Consultation Form Version 1.5
|
|Back to SUMMARY|
|Back to OUTLINE|
|Back to SECTION 1|
|Back to SECTION 2|
|Back to SECTION 3|
|Back to SECTION 4|
|Back to SECTION 5|
|Back to SECTION 6|
|Back to SECTION 7|
|Back to SECTION 8|
|Back to SECTION 9|
| Link to Page 2 |
|Link to the Home Page|
NEWS FROM THE MILLENNIUM PROJECT
The Millennium Project has announced the publication of Futures Research Methodology Version 3.0 (FRM-V3), edited by Jerome C. Glenn and Theodore J. Gordon. It is the largest, most comprehensive collection of internationally peer-reviewed methods and tools to explore future possibilities ever assembled in one resource. FRM-V3 contains 39 chapters totaling about 1,300 pages.
COVER & LIST OF CONTENTS
For more information, visit the FRM-V3 Home Page.
BACKGROUND
The Millennium Project is a global participatory futures research think tank of futurists, scholars, business planners, and policy makers who work for international organizations, governments, corporations, NGOs, and universities. The Millennium Project manages a coherent and cumulative process that collects and assesses judgments from its several hundred participants to produce the annual
"State of the Future", "Futures Research Methodology" series, and special studies such as the State of the Future Index, Future Scenarios for Africa, Lessons of History, Environmental Security, Applications of Futures Research to Policy, and a 700+ annotated scenarios bibliography.
INTERNATIONAL ECUMENICAL PEACE CONVOCATION
Kingston, Jamaica, will be the host city for the International Ecumenical Peace Convocation in May 2011. The convocation is sponsored by the World Council of Churches (WCC) and will meet under the theme "Glory to God and peace on earth". It will be the culmination of the WCC's Decade to Overcome Violence (DOV), which has sought to network and bring attention to the peacemaking initiatives of its various member churches. For more information, see the convocation announcement.
|
|
Divinity & Humanity
Selected web sites:
Anima & Animus
Dante's Divine Comedy
Gateway to the Holy Bible
Gateway to the Holy Qur'an
Girardian Biblical Reflections
Homo sapiens sapiens
Human Behavior
Human Conscience
Human Emotions
Human Ethics
Human Evolution Table
Human Evolution Timeline
Human Freedom & Free Will
Human Motivations
Human Nature
Human Person
Human Psychology
Human Reasoning
Human Rights
Human Sexual Behavior
Human Sexuality
Human Violence
Humanity & Christianity
Humanity & Islam
Humanist Culture
Humanity & Judaism
Mimetic Theory
One World, Under God
Original Unity of Man & Woman
Origins of Humankind
Religion & Spirituality
Religion and Nature
Science, Religion & Human Brain
Sacrifice & Paschal Mystery
Theology of the Body
Two Wings of a Bird
Homo sapiens sapiens
Homo sapiens sapiens
Poor Girl - Cambodia
Homo sapiens sapiens
Poor Girl - Africa
Homo sapiens sapiens Ursula M. Burns President, Xerox Corporation
Homo sapiens sapiens
Street Boy - China
Homo sapiens sapiens
Rt. Rev. Jane Alexander
Bishop of Edmonton Anglican Church of Canada
Homo sapiens sapiens
Sonia Sotomayor U.S. Federal Judge Supreme Court Nominee
Homo sapiens sapiens
Chinese Farmer Don Tai, China
Homo sapiens sapiens Nicolas Sarkozi
President of France
Homo sapiens sapiens
Poor Sick Girl - Africa
Solidarity & Subsidiarity
Selected web sites:
Amnesty International
Christian Solidarity Worldwide
Christian Solidarity
Climate Change-Human Solidarity
Conception of Gender Equality
Crisis & Regulation
Dalit Solidarity Network
Declaration of Human Rights
Ecclesiastical Sexism
Fairer Globalization
Gender & Global Change
Gender, Climate & Security
Gender, Democracy & Solidarity
Gender Equality - Men & Boys
Global Economy & Ethics
Global Solidarity (ICTU)
Global Solidarity Dialogue
Global Solidarity
Globalization & Solidarity
Heavenly Sexism
Human Rights & Gender Equity
Human Solidarity & Climate
Human Solidarity & Economics
Human Solidarity & Gender
Human Solidarity & Security
Human Solidarity & Justice
Human Solidarity & Poverty
Human Solidarity Video
Inter-Gender Solidarity
Inter-Parliamentary Union
Market Economy & Ethics
Millennium Development Goals
NCC Eco-Justice Resources
New Civilization Network
No Fast Track on Poverty
Policy Innovations
Poverty Reduction Network
Precautionary Principle - Wiki
Precautionary Principle - Wings
Precautionary Principle - SEHN
Principle Of Acceptance
Principle Of Action/Reaction
Principle of Adaptation
Principle Of Denying Opposites
Principle Of Immediate Action
Principle Of Liberty
Principle Of Pleasure
Principle of Proportion
Principle of Solidarity
Principle of Subsidiarity - Acton
Principle of Subsidiarity - PD
Principle Of Cumulative Actions
Principle of Timely Action
Principle Of Wise Action
Principles of Valid Action
Prophet of Human Solidarity
Social Psychology Network
Social Solidarity - Durkheim
Social Solidarity - Wiki
Solidarity Orgs Directory
Subsidiarity & Human Rights
Subsidiarity in Organizations
Toward Global Solidarity
UN Human Rights Pubs
Values for Human Solidarity
'We are also Human'
When More is Less
Sustainability & Sustainable Development
Selected web sites:
A Blueprint for Survival
AIRNOW - Air Quality Site
Alliance for Sustainability
Biodiversity International
BP Energy Charting Tool
BP Environment Charting Tool
Climate-Biodiversity
Climate-Cost of Inaction
Climate-ENERGYMAP
Climate-Human Rights
Climate Change-IPCC
Climate Change-IUCN
Climate Policy-PEER
Climate Change-UN Gateway
Climate Change-UFCCC
Columbia Earth Institute
Development Gateway
Earth Charter Initiative
Earth Policy Institute
Earth Protect (Green Videos)
Earthwatch Worldwide
Ecopsychology/NatureConnect
Eikosphere
Encyclopedia of Earth
Energy - Peak Oil Alternatives
Energy - Peak Oil Big Picture
Energy - Peak Oil Brain Food
Energy - Peak Oil Directory
Energy - Peak Oil Hubbert
Energy - Peak Oil ODAC
Energy - Peak Oil Primer
Energy - Renewable
Energy - Renewable Directory
Energy - Renewable Options
Energy - Renewable REN21
Environmental Defense Fund
Forum for the Future
Forum of Health Research
Fostering Sustainable Behavior
Global Oceans
Green Design Institute
German Sustainability Guide
Green Design Institute EIOLCA
Impact of Financial Crisis
Int'l Inst of Sust Dev
Learning for Sustainability
Millennium Development Goals
Millennium Eco-Assessment
Natural Resource Forum
New Industrial Revolution
Planet 2025 Network
Scorecard - Pollution Information
Sustainability - BIONIS
Sustainability - Brundlandt
Sustainability - Economics
Sustainability - Excellence
Sustainability Institute
Sustainability Journal
Sustainability - Seven Triads
Sustainability - Top 10 Myths
Sustainable Development BINK
Sustainable Development HB
Sustainable Development PBL
Sustainable Development Wiki
Sustainable Energy E-Book
Technology & Climate Change
The Hannover Principles
The Value-Behavior Gap
The Ecocosm Paradox
UN Environmental Program
UN Human Habitat
UN Population Network
UN Social Development
UN Sustainable Development
UN UNDP Development Prog
UN UNEP Environmental Prog
UN UNESCO (Education)
UN UNFPA (Population)
UN UNICEF (Children)
UN UNIFEM (Women)
UN UNU Dev Economics
UN Women Watch
World Environmental Org
World Resources Institute
World Watch Institute
WTO's Development Crumbs
Educational Resources for Sustainability & Sustainable Development
Selected web sites:
Academic Earth
Academy for Educational Development
Biomimicry Institute
Bioneers
Center for Youth Development
Child Trends
Cloud Institute
Ecoliteracy Center
EcoSeed Global Green Portal
Education for Sustainability
ESD - AASHE
ESD - BINK
ESD - Business Cases
ESD - eBook
ESD - GDRC
ESD - HEA - UK
ESD - HEFCE UK
ESD - PLoS
ESD - Toolkit
ESD - UNESCO Bangkok
ESD - UNESCO Nairobi
ESD - UNESCO WC2009
ESD - UNU
ESD - USA
ESD - Wales UK
ESD - Wikipedia
Environmental Ed - EEAO
Environmental Ed - NAAEE
Facing the Future
Global Warming is Real
Green Teacher
Integral Ecology Center
Integral Education
Integral Institute
Integral Sustainability Center
Integral University
Next Step Integral
OER Commons
OER Handbook
OLCOS Roadmap 2012
OpenCourseWare Consortium
Partnership for Global Learning
PBS Natural Resources
PBS Videos on Social Issues
Sustainability Higher Education
Teachers Without Borders
UNU OpenCourseWare
UNESCO Open Training
UNESCO World Heritage Center
Vision 2050 Roadmap
WGBH Educational Resources
Violence & Nonviolence
Selected web sites:
Albert Einstein Institution
Center for Nonviolent Conflict
Center Global Nonkilling
Christian Nonviolence
Christianity & Violence
Christian Patriarchy
Culture of Patriarchy
Culture of Peace
Dalai Lama Foundation
Educators for Nonviolence
Farewell to Pax Americana
Gandhi Nonviolence Institute
Gender Violence Directory
Global Directory Peace Studies
Global Nonviolence
Greenpeace International
Ideologies of War and Terror
Kroc Peace/Justice Institute
Metta Center
MLK Jr Library & Archive
MLK Jr Principles of Nonviolence
Nonviolence International
Nonviolent Conflict Resolution
Patriarchy & Christianity
Patriarchy & Domestic Violence
Patriarchy & Gender Violence
Patriarchy & Hinduism
Patriarchy & 'Honor Killings'
Patriarchy & Islam
Religion and World Peace
Pax Americana
Pax Christi
Pax Humanitas
Pax Natura
Pax Romana
Peace & Solidarity Network
The End of Pax Americana?
The Patriarchs are Coming!
Understanding Patriarchy
University for Peace
Violence and Religion
Indicators & Trends
Selected web sites:
Basic Capabilities Index
Child & Youth Indicators
Child Development Index
Corruption Perceptions Index
Ecological Footprint
Economic Freedom Index
Education for All Index
Emissions Data (EDGAR)
Env & SD Indicators
Env Performance index (EPI)
GDP (PPP) Per Capita
Gender Equity Index
Genuine Progress Indicator
Global Corruption Barometer
Global Gender Gap Index
Global Peace Index
Gross Domestic Product
Human Development Index
Human Development Trends
Human Trafficking Indicators
ICT Development Index
Living Planet Index
Population Growth
Redefining Progress
Sustainability Indicators
UN-CSD SD Indicators
UN-MDG Millennium Indicators
USA-IGW SD Indicators
Children & Youth
Selected web sites:
Children & Youth
Children, Youth, and Families
Children's Digital Library
Climate Change for Kids
Education for All
Env Education Center
Env Links for Kids
Env Websites for Kids
Facing the Future
Natural Resources Kids Web
Story of Stuff
Tunza for Youth & Children
Voices of Youth
WebQuest Resources
Our Common Future
Selected web sites:
A Future Without War
Bahá'í Vision of the Future
Corporation 20/20
Facing the Future
Focus on the Future
Future Generations
Future of Humanity Institute
Futures Research Institute
Futures Research Methodology
Futures Research Methods
Global Trends 2025
Green Futures
Growth in Transition
Our Common Future
Shaping Tomorrow
State of the Future
Sustainable Futures Institute
World Future Society
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
MDG Definitions:
1. Reduce poverty and hunger
2. Educating all children
3. Empowering women
4. Saving children
5. Caring for mothers
6. Combating disease
7. Using resources wisely
8. Working together
MDG Resources:
MDG Atlas
MDG Basic Indicators
MDG Core Strategy
MDG Dashboard
MDG Data (DevInfo)
MDG Local Resources
MDG Monitor
MDG National Resources
MDG Progress Report 2008
MDG Slides (Columbia)
MDG Slides (SlideShare)
MDG Targets & Indicators
MDG-Net and DGP-Net
MDGs and Governance
MDGs and Health
MDGs and Human Rights
MDGs and Youth
MDGs UN Gateway
MDGs UN Project
Related Resources:
Earth Charter
Gender Equity Index 2008
Global Trends 2025
HDR Report 2007-2008
Human Rights Watch 2008
Living Planet Report 2008
UNESCO Yearbook 2008
WESS Report 2008
World Development 2008
World Disasters Report 2008
World Energy Outlook 2008
World Health Statistics 2008
World Population 2008
World Resources 2008
World's Girls 2008
Industrial Development 2009
World's Forests 2009
State of the World 2009
UNEP Year Book 2009
World's Children 2009
World Water Report 2009
UNESCO GMR 2009
WB-IMF MDG GMR 2009
IMF WEO 2009
REN21 Renewable Energy 2009
Gender and Governance
Carbon 2009
Little Green Data Book 2009
OECD Social Indicators 2009
Current Outlook:
MDG Indicators
DevInfo (UN Database)
Good Practices for Using DevInfo
Current Outlook by MDG:
1. Reduce poverty and hunger
2. Educating all children
3. Empowering women
4. Saving children
5. Caring for mothers
6. Combating disease
7. Using resources wisely
8. Working together
Maps of Human Knowledge
Selected web sites:
Author Mapper
Biodiversity Info Standards
DDC Classification
DDC - OCLC Version
Encyclopedic - Britannica
Encyclopedic - Directory
Encyclopedic - Wikipedia
Internet Archive
LCC Classification
LCC CyberStacks
Map of Human Knowledge
Map of Knowledge
Maps of Science - LANL
OCLC/WorldCat
PelicanWeb Knowledge Taxonomy
Topic Maps - Cocking
Topic Maps - Biezunski
Topic Maps - Cocking
Topic Maps - ISO 13250
Announcements
GLOBAL CHALLENGE 2009
The International Sustainable Development Research Society (ISDRS), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 5-8 July 2009. See the conference flyer and the conference website. Email contact: FBU Conference Office.
SEXUAL VIOLENCE
The Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI) is pleased to invite you to its first conference, to be held in Johannesburg, South Africa, 6 - 9 July 2009. For more information and points of contact, visit the SVRI Forum 2009 and the SVRI web site.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Society for Conservation Biology, 11-16 July 2009, Beijing, China. See the CONBIO meeting website or contact SCB2009 .
SYSTEM SCIENCES
The 2009 conference of the International Society for Systems Sciences (ISSS) is to be held in at The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 12-17 July 2009. Focus on sustainability. For further information and registration visit the conference website.
RELIGION, NATURE, AND CULTURE
International Society for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture (ISSRNC). University of Amsterdam, 23–26 July 2009. Conference director: Kocku von Stuckrad. Contact: ISSRNC2009.
SYSTEM DYNAMICS
International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 26-31 July 2009, Albuquerque, NM. Visit the conference website and contact the Program Chair.
OSLO SUMMER SCHOOL
The Oslo Summer School in Comparative Social Science Studies 2009. A course on "Liberation and Participation: Theory and Method for a Social and Political Community Psychology." Lecturer: Professor Maritza Montero, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. Dates: 27 - 31 July 2009. The syllabus for the course is already posted. For more information: Professor Hilde Eileen Nafstad.
RELIGION & CONSUMERISM
International Society for the Sociology of Religion, Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 27-31 July 2009. See the conference website for more information. The point of contact is Hilde Van Meerbeeck-Cravillon.
GREEN ECONOMICS
The 4th Annual Green Economics Conference will take place at Mansfield College, Oxford University, 31 July to 1 August 2009.
Please email us at Green Economics Institute if you want to book or speak or reserve a place.
UNEP TUNZA CONFERENCE
Tunza International Children’s Conference on the Environment, Daejeon, Korea, 17-21 August 2009. For more details visit the Tunza web site or contact the Tunza staff.
PSYCHOLOGY & RELIGION
International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR 2009), Vienna, Austria, 23 to 27 August 2009. Local organizing committee: Susanne Heine and Herman Westerink, University of Vienna.
PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR
Royal Geographic Society, 26-28 August 2009, Manchester University, UK. Website: AC2009. Abstracts: Louise Reid and Tom Hargreaves.
FEMINIST ETHICS & SOCIAL THEORY
The Association for Feminist Ethics And Social Theory (FEAST), 24-27 September 2009, Clear Water Beach, Florida. Panels on "Environmental Feminism" and "Evolutionary Psychology." Questions may be directed to Lisa Schwartzman.
WORLD POPULATION
The International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), 27 September - 2 October 2009, Marrakech, Morocco. For more information, visit the conference website and contact marrakech2009.
ISLAMIC THOUGHT
International Seminar on Islamic Thought, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, 6-7 October 2009. For more info visit the conference website.
WOMEN, LEADERSHIP & MOSQUES
CFP: Women, Leadership and Mosques: Changes in Contemporary Islamic Authority. Oxford University, 16-17 October 2009. Please send proposals to Hilary Kalmbach.
KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
International Conference on Knowledge Economy, South Africa, October 20 - 22nd.
See the conference website. The point of contact is Carmen Fitz-Gerald.
SOCIAL RIGHTS
International Symposium on Social Rights, 22-23 October 2009, Akdeniz University, Antalaya, Turkey. For more information, please visit the conference website . The main point of contact is sosyalhaklar. Additional contacts are Prof. Nergis Mütevellioglu, Assist. Prof. Hale Balseven, Research Assist. Mehmet Zanbak.
SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION
Discoveries in the Scientific Study of Religion, Denver, 23-25 October 2009. Visit the SSSR2009 conference website. Point of contact: Kraig Beyerlein, Program Chair.
AFRICA GIS
International Conference Africa GIS2009, 26– 29 October 2009, Kampala, Uganda. For more information, please visit the AFRICAGIS2009 web site and contact AfricaGIS 2009.
CLIMATE CHANGE
The world's climate neutral Scientific Climate Conference, 2-6 November 2009 online. Organized by the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences. For more information, visit the CLIMATE 2009 conference website and contact the conference staff at CLIMATE 2009. Note: the website already includes a listing of climate studies available at the Climate Change Studies Library (CCSL).
STATE OF THE WORLD CONFERENCE 2009
November 12-14, 2009, Washington DC. Sponsored by the Integral Institute (Ken Wilber et al). The theme is: "Mobilizing to Save Civilization: A Ten Year Plan to Address Climate Change." From the conference web site: "It is to bring attention to the critical issue of climate change and to catalyze a ten year plan to green our economies that the State of the World Forum is convening a three day conference November 12-14, 2009 in Washington D.C. The 2009 Forum will launch a ten year campaign that will meet in a different world city each year." Current point of contact: DC Hilton Hotel, Washington DC, USA, 1-202-483-3000.
Other contacts will be posted as they become available.
BEHAVIOR, ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE
The 2009 BECC Conference is the 3rd annual conference focused on accelerating our transition to an energy-efficient and low carbon economy through an improved understanding and application of social & behavioral mechanisms of change. Sponsored by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). When: November 15-18th, 2009. Where: Washington DC. For more details visit the BECC 2009 Conference web site or contact the BECC 2009 Conference Chair.
EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE
"Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet." 2009 Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Amsterdam, 2-4 December 2009. Launch event of the Earth System Governance Project, a new ten-year research programme under the auspices of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP). For more information, visit the conference website or contact Frank Biermann.
PARLIAMENT OF THE
WORLD'S RELIGIONS
Parliament of the World's Religions, 3-9 December 2009, Melbourne, Australia. Key topics: Healing the Earth with Care and Concern, Reconciling with Indigenous Peoples, Overcoming Poverty in a Patriarchal World, Securing Food and Water for all People, Building Peace in the Pursuit of Justice, Creating Social Cohesion in Village and City, Sharing Wisdom in the Search for Inner Peace. For more info: PWR2009.
NEW GREEN ECONOMY
The National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) is pleased to request your participation at the 10th National Conference for Science, Policy and the Environment: The New Green Economy: Aligning Science, Education, Markets and Systems for Sustainability to be held January 20-22, 2010 at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, DC. Please plan to join NCSE in a large interactive conference to develop and advance science-based solutions for the creation of a “green print” to achieve a sustainable, new green economy. See the conference website. Questions? Contact the NCSE Green Economy Conference
APPLIED ENERGY
International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE2010). Sponsored by the University of Singapore. Theme: "Energy Solutions for a Sustainable World." 21-23 April 2010, Singapore. Call for papers and other conference information: ICAE 2010 Web Site. Point of contact: ICAE 2010.
SOCIOLOGY CONGRESS
International Sociological Association (ISA) World Congress of Sociology, 11-17 July 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden. Session on "Peace, Conflict, and Climate Change" currently scheduled for Wednesday 14 July 2010. See the conference web site for more details or contact the conference chair, Hans Joas, Universität Erfurt, Germany.
RELIGION: A HUMAN PHENOMENON
International Association for the History of Religions (IAHR), 15-21 August 2010, Toronto, Canada. Visit the conference website. The conference director is Professor Donald Wiebe.
STUDY OF THE COMMONS
The International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASC) is accepting for hosting the 13th Biennial Conference, Summer or Autumn 2010. For more information contact Jim Robson and visit the IASCP website.
PEACE CONVOCATION
The International Ecumenical Peace Convocation (IEPC) will be the Harvest Festival of the Decade to Overcome Violence and at the same time a planting season for fresh initiatives. May 2011, Kingston, Jamaica. Sponsored by the World Council of Churches (WCC). Visit the IEPC web site, which provides points of contact worldwide.
CALL FOR PAPERS SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). PNAS has launched a new section of the journal dedicated to sustainability science, an emerging field of research dealing with the interactions between natural and social systems, and with how those interactions affect the challenge of sustainability: meeting the needs of present and future generations while substantially reducing poverty and conserving the planet’s life support systems. PNAS seeks original research contributions for this new section on both the fundamental character of interactions among humans, their technologies, and the environment, and on the use of such knowledge to advance sustainability goals relevant to water, food, energy, health, habitation, mobility, and ecosystem services. PNAS welcomes outstanding sustainability science papers addressing spatial scales from the global to the local and drawing on a wide range of disciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. For more information, please contact Josiah Armour.
CALL FOR PAPERS RELIGION & SPIRITUALITY
This issue of Feminist Review, edited by Lyn Thomas and Avtar Brah, will explore a range of religious and spiritual practices through the lens of gender, and will encompass both theoretical and empirical approaches. We hope to engage with feminism’s long history of critique of the patriarchal nature of world religions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam, and more recent problematisations of these approaches in light of feminism’s relationship to the Enlightenment and to colonialism. Recent work on the gendering of secularisation theories and on women’s practice of faith and spirituality has complicated and nuanced feminist approaches to religion; this issue will address these questions, while attempting to broaden the debate beyond the binary oppositions and alignments of religion (and most notably Islam) with tradition and ‘backwardness’, and of feminisms with modernity and secularism. Submissions for the issue are welcomed from now until February 28th, 2010. Point of contact: Dr Lyn Thomas.
Call for Papers
Both subscribers and nonsubscribers are cordially invited to submit a paper to be considered for publication in the PelicanWeb Journal of Sustainable Development as an "invited paper." It should be related to the journal's theme about solidarity, sustainability, and nonviolence as the three pillars of sustainable development. In particular, the current focus is on education for sustainable development. Some suggested themes:
Successful initiatives to foster solidarity, sustainability, and nonviolence
Gender equality as a positive factor for sustainable development
Removal of obstacles for progress toward any or all the UN MDGs
Management of technologies for social and environmental justice
How to foster human development via spirituality and the inner journey
How to foster human and social development via acts of solidarity
How to improve systems of governance via checks and balances
How to evolve collectively toward a culture of sustainability
Invited papers will be published in a separate web page. If you have friends who could submit a good paper, please invite them to do so.
Please email your papers to the Editor.
| |
SUBSCRIBE
|
|