-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESD CONSULTATION FORM - VERSION 1.0-1.1 -
MAY 2009
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
consultation on education for sustainable development (ESD) is
sponsored by the E-Journal of Solidarity, Sustainability, and
Nonviolence (SSNV). UNESCO has defined eight key areas that
should be covered in education for sustainable development: gender
equality, health care, environmental stewardship, rural development,
cultural diversity, peace & security, sustainable urbanization, and
sustainable consumption. There are 5 questions in each key area,
for a total of 40 questions.
Needless to say, UNESCO is not
responsible for any misconceptions that the questions might contain.
Same applies to the answers to be entered, collected, and analyzed.
Hopefully, this exercise will lead to some useful insights and perhaps
even some recommendations about education for sustainable development,
but there is no presumption that such results will be useful to UNESCO
or any other institution.
You have been selected either because
you are a member of the SSNV Google Group, or a participant in one of
several fora related to sustainable development, or by another
individual who has given us your name, because of your expertise in
sustainable development and/or related global issues such as gender
discrimination, the gap between the very rich and the very poor, and
the deterioration of the human habitat.
The consultation form
can be completed in one hour or so. Answer each of the questions to the
best of your knowledge. All of your responses will remain anonymous.
Complete the survey and press the submit button at the end.
When you press submit, your answers are added to the survey
spreadsheet. A summary of the findings will be made available to
participants who provide contact information.
Version 1 is a
significant revision of Version 0. For more information of how
the questionnaire was redesigned and rewritten based on V0 feedback and
further research, see the following web page:
E-Journal of Solidarity, Sustainability, and Nonviolence, V5 N5 May 2009
http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv05n05page1.html
UPDATE (VERSION 1.1)
Version
1.1 is an update to clarify the intent of the multiple choice
questions. The intent is not to imply that there is one "best
answer" as in academic examinations. There is no such thing as
"the" best answer in sustainable development. Rather, the intent
is to test participant response when they are constrained to selecting
one from a finite set of choices, as often happens due to various kinds
of constraints. According to the "precautionary principle," doing
nothing is not an option. Thus it becomes a matter of selecting,
from among a finite set of options, the one that is "best" in the sense
of being the "most desirable" (or, the "least undesirable") in terms of
the anticipated positive/negative impacts on sustainable development.
Subsequent versions of this survey will test other kinds of
questions (such as "select all that apply").
Thank you for your patience and participation.
Luis T. Gutierrez, Ph.D.
Editor, E-Journal of Solidarity, Sustainability, and Nonviolence
http://pelicanweb.org/solisust.html
This is a monthly, free subscription, open access e-journal.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSULTATION FORM VERSION 1.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB:
In Version 1, most questions are multiple choice and it is requested
that the participant select "the best answer." This does not mean
that other answers are wrong. It simply means that, given that
only one option can be chosen, the responder must decide which one is
"the best."
* Required